The question does not highlight a logical inconsistency. To support a position or a policy or an option or an action that you yourself would not choose to exercise is not logically inconsistent. People take such positions every day. Generally the subject is of little consequence and no one pays any attention.
You may support a person's right to follow a fad diet that may be unhealthy and choose not to partake in the diet yourself, for example.
On a more significant scale, you might support someone's right to voice an unpopular opinion, even though you yourself disagree with the opinion or would never express it yourself (remember the old saying, "I disagree with your opinion, but will defend to the death your right to hold and express it).
And so it is with abortion. To support the policy granting choice or to support a person's exercising that choice even though you yourself would not choose to do so is not logically inconsistent and it does not make one a hypocrite (1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion or 2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings). The person is acting within the range or scope of allowable actions under the policy being advocated. The policy allows for no abortion or an abortion. The action is consistent.
2006-08-28 10:22:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by E D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I support a woman's right to choose because it is important to preserve that right. I wouldn't "want" an abortion for me or a family member because it would never be a pleasant decision. But if any of us needed one, I wouldn't want to have lost the option. A better way to see this is the other way around: do you really believe that the fervent anti-abortion person wouldn't want an abortion for his 13-year-old daughter if she were pregnant? Do you think it's never happened? If you do, you're kidding yourself.
2006-08-28 13:22:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by sunshinegirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the law states that nobody can tell a woman what to do with her own body. They cannot mandate tests, surgery or any other procedure and this includes an abortion. It is up to the woman who's body it is and nobody else.In a perfect world, there would be no unwanted pregnancies-however that is not reality. Mistakes happen and no woman should have to go through an unwanted pregnancy, and a child if she does not want to. Period. End of story. This especially goes to all the MEN right to lifers out there.You have no idea what a pregnancy entails so mind your own f uc k ing business.
2006-08-28 10:02:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by mcghankathy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not about being abortion being acceptable. I firmly support a woman's right to choose. That being said, abortion sometimes has serious psychological side effects and has caused a close friend to go through a serious depression. I wouldn't want that kind of pain inflicted on anyone that I know or love.
2006-08-28 10:01:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That's the great thing about this country... It's called 'a woman's right to choose' for a reason. I don't believe in abortion for myself for religious reasons and because I have a child (I couldn't imagine having her vacuumed out of me before she ever had a chance to develop) who was unplanned. But someone else's situation may be different from mine. What if she was raped? What if the potential father is an alcoholic or an abuser? What if she's only 13 y.o.? What if she does not believe in God? It's up to each individual to decide for themselves. My responsibility is to decide for me and not judge others regardless of my religious belief.
2006-08-28 10:01:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by treasures320 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
you at the instant are not accustomed to abortion procedures in any respect. the main uncomplicated technique is suction. the two the fetus is taken out finished because of the fact it truly is totally small or it truly is obliterated. there's no "pulling aside" till it truly is a D&E, it is uncommon. additionally, there's no poisoning with salt or saline. it truly is no longer executed. And that video you observed grew to become into probable The Silent Scream, which grew to become right into a pretend video finished of lies. carry out a little actual study, particularly of spewing what the pro-lifers have fed you. i recognize many women persons who've aborted, and a number of different of them went directly to have toddlers while they have been waiting. Does that cause them to monsters? No. That makes them women persons who knew that it wasn't the splendid time to be bringing yet another existence into the international. do in contrast to abortions? don't get one. And once you at the instant are not getting one, how approximately protecting your nostril out of the uteri of different women persons? If a girl chooses an abortion, it is her genuine. you haven't any genuine to end her.
2016-11-05 23:34:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
~Unlike the bible thumpers and irrational bigots, I am smart enough to understand that my personal sentiments are just that, personal. I lack the wisdom and hubris to try to foist and force my ideals and morality on the world at large. I love a good steak, but I wouldn't dream of forcing a vegetarian to eat meat. I hate baseball, but I wouldn't dream of trying to prohibit others from watching or playing the game. I celebrate Christmas as a non-religous holiday, but I would never try to prevent a church goer from tempering the day with the mythology, nor would I try to force a Muslem or a Jew acknowledge the day as anything more than December 25. What I do with my body is none of your concern, and what you do with yours is of no consequence to me, other than that we both have the right to make the choice. All pretty much the same type issue. No inconsistency there. Duh.
2006-08-28 10:04:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the woman should have the choice. It is her body and she is the one who will deal with the consequences. I nor anyone else can tell her what to do with it.
I do not think that abortion should be used as a form of birth control. Counselling after the first abortion would definitely be called for.
2006-08-28 09:59:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Canadian Ken 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I understand your question, its a dilemma.
These people then would make the argument that its pro choice and people can do what they want. And that actually is perhaps the pro choice's peoples best argument.
When they call the baby a fetus and get into ridiculous arguments that its just a blob and not a living being is when they insult my intellegience. They should just admit that killing of babies is ok, in their book. But going back to your question, that some don't want to kill their own, but its ok for others to do so, yeah there is a hypocrisy there.
2006-08-28 10:00:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by TG Special 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I support women's right to choose, right to her body, including abortion, though I think a woman who wants to have an abortion should explain her reasons to a professional committee, that will include doctors and social workers only,
What others think is their issue
2006-08-28 09:59:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋