I say its beyond obvious that he didn't do it and i say its beyond obvious some (possibly from inside the house) did it.
i still stand by that the mother had something to do with it.
you'd have blamed oj and anyone like him if the first thing he did was go out and get a media consultant to help with their image as well as to get a lawyer. face women aren't above killing their kids-even the rich, after all there's andrea yates and that one women who killed all five of her kids, etc.
2006-08-28 09:44:28 · 10 answers · asked by NONAME 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
some of you are just down right stupid. i wrote this as the news came out that karr didn't match the dna. no this isn't cis or what ever they are called. stop getting your info from tv crime show,that are never accurate on actual details.
time just showed us that he had nothing to do with this.
make sure you come back and tell me
you were wrong.
2006-08-28 13:27:31 · update #1
the mom did it. there are so much distorted supposed evidence.
Its ridiculous. I say the real killer is already dead....God will prosecute.
2006-08-28 09:50:53 · answer #1 · answered by ♣ 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes but say (even though to most of us this is inconceivable)
if a family member by accident did kill her,......they couldn't have hurt her privates. They wouldn't and couldn't internally hurt their child even after the child would've passed. Think about what you are saying here when it comes to a mother/father & child. This poor woman is turnnig in her grave & will be until the killer is caught. Maybe this sicko did kill her. He said he hid under the bed in the other room. The dust ruffle was disturbed in the picture of the room across from her room.
You are missing something here. We all are,......Just like the cops did by going after the family & allowing the real person to get away.
I think the reason Karr's wife is saying she spent Christmas with him that year is because she already knows what he did & never came forward with the info she had. Therefore she can be charged as an accomplise. I don't think she wanted all that attention on her and her family it was too much for her to handle.
She figured whats done is done & he's living so far away from that family nothing to worry about unless he opens his mouth. Keeping him quiet must've been a 24 hour a day job.
That poor family. DNA soon shall tell.
Not necessarily saying what he did as far as a murder but he's so strange acting you know he molested someones child with all that love stuff he proclaims he has for the these 5-6-7-8 year old kids.
2006-08-28 17:01:34 · answer #2 · answered by paintressa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've doubted Karr was guilty from the day he was arrested.
It just doesn't add up.
The only thing strange about this whole affair is why the Boulder police didn't do their homework before they had him extradited.
Of course, if the police had done their job correctly the first time, the real killer would have been arrested ten years ago.
As for Karr - he is a weirdo and probably is a child molester...but until I have proof of that, I'll just consider him a rather odd person and will try to avoid him.
2006-08-28 16:52:09 · answer #3 · answered by docscholl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's no way for us to know, since we don't have any more evidence than the press chooses to give us. BUT, based on his alleged admission of facts that don't fit the case (although they also say the evidence was bungled, so who even knows) I have a gut feeling that something is wrong here. Consider this though: would you rather be arrested in Thailand for some sort of sex crime with minors, or be extradited to the US, and then be acquitted of the crime you confessed to? If you're as sick a puppy as Karr appears to be, having a crappy reputation but being a free man in the US is probably as good as he's going to get.
2006-08-28 17:03:33 · answer #4 · answered by newbie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I refuse to pass judgments on people when not given all the facts. I will never have all the facts - so in the interest of being a fair person I cannot say one way or another.
Anyone who takes a side at this early stage is simply not a very intelligent person.
2006-08-28 16:53:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but that weird son-of-a-***** killed someone. We just don't know who, yet. He was in Thailand for god's sake. You can get 10 year old prostitutes in Bangkok
2006-08-28 16:49:21 · answer #6 · answered by Klawed Klawson 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I will make it short and very simple! Karr did not kill anyone; or fat least Joan Bonet....
2006-08-28 16:56:31 · answer #7 · answered by virginiamayoaunt 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the crime was by the mother,covered up by the father
2006-08-28 16:55:45 · answer #8 · answered by BellaDonna 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
it's not his DNA but why would someone admit to a murder they didn't do???? Totally WACKED!
2006-08-28 16:48:19 · answer #9 · answered by my2cents 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No... but if you ask if he should still be locked up... YES
2006-08-28 16:50:10 · answer #10 · answered by FullMast 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋