2006-08-28 09:38:07 · 13 answers · asked by Ah Ha 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
but they can secure trees?
2006-08-28 09:43:11 · update #1
because a strong national defense can put down a peasent communist revolution with ease.
2006-08-28 09:40:21 · answer #1 · answered by W E J 4 · 0⤊ 6⤋
Where do you get that idea? Most liberals I know are about securing our borders, doing more for homeland defense, catching terrorists. Just because we don't believe that the Bush administration has no idea what they're doing, doesn't make us weak. We're no safer now than we were back then. And that's according to the GAO.
2006-08-28 16:42:42 · answer #2 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Now why would you even have to post that question??? You seem to know all their is to know about us so let's have you tell us why we're "so weak on security"? I know our nation's ports set the standards for security, Mission Accomplished in Iraq, they're all welcoming us as liberators!! Afghanistan's tourism is booming and there's no more violence against us!! Maybe one day us liberals can attain that level of success!!! We can only hope.........
2006-08-28 17:00:01 · answer #3 · answered by carpediem 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean why libs. don't want foreign companies in charge of our major ports like boosh does. You mean why libs. would rather have our fighting men/women here in America defending our borders.
You mean why libs. want to go by our constitution and get warrants to bug and have surveillance teams on American citizens.
You mean their soft because boosh your hero said so. He's such a liar how could you believe anything he says. He wants to save and protect the Iraq people from Saddam and stop the WMD that weren't there. It's got nothing to do with oil and the billions Halliburton will make from us.
2006-08-28 17:53:18 · answer #4 · answered by Matrix 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I bet your a freak Ah-Ha. I'm bet you experience frightening hallucinations or feelings of paranoia, especially as a result of listening to your leader Boooosh.
2006-08-28 16:43:15 · answer #5 · answered by BT 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's not that they are weak on security, they just take more of a reactive stance VS a proactive stance.
2006-08-28 16:43:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
9/11, iraq,north korea,iran i think the repubs are batting 0 for4
2006-08-28 16:42:57 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because Carl Rove said so!!!
2006-08-28 16:45:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why do neocons dodge the draft?
2006-08-28 16:41:43 · answer #9 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
MUST REPEAT COULTER.....
MUST REPEAT COULTER.....
Do original thoughts cause actual pain to neo-cons?
2006-08-28 17:38:54 · answer #10 · answered by Schmorgen 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think you're opinions are fact, just because?
2006-08-28 16:40:22 · answer #11 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋