I still think the son had something to do with the crime!!!!
2006-08-28 09:36:26 · 11 answers · asked by GreenEYED Beauty 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
First they didn't take DNA from the son(too young) second he was so jelous of JonBenet he became inraged!!!! Think about it.....
2006-08-28 10:10:01 · update #1
Yes, yes, yes....thank you. I'm so glad someone finally said it and feels the same way I do. I think he was paid off by the Ramsey family to take the eye off them.
2006-08-28 09:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by dollfacedbaby1 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no I don't think they were involved at all. I did up until Karr was arrested but than listening to the actual evidence and not the media mock-up I don't think they are.
But what I was wondering is if they know someone that was involved and arrested Karr to kind of smoke out the actual murderer - kind of like the real murderer won't want someone else to take credit for his crime....
It seems strange that a DA would bring in someone in 10 year old murder case on something as inconclusive as e-mails. I thought they would have some more solid evidence.
2006-08-28 09:44:20 · answer #2 · answered by Smithy14 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the DNA test came back today negative, so it can't be John Karr - but it didn't match with the father or brother either. I think Karr is just a fruit cake looking for attention
2006-08-28 09:43:16 · answer #3 · answered by buggsnme2 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the parents have something to do with it all. I think John Karr was paid by the Dad to admit to the killing. I find it very convenient that all of this comes out after his wife dies of cancer. Why now? The Dad did it!
2006-08-28 09:42:44 · answer #4 · answered by Lisamichelle 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that is the case from what I have read. I would like to know where all the money came from as his travels were very extensive. From the interviews from his class mates he was a "weirdo" to start with; and maybe even a "petifile". (sp)
I heard one report that he needed a free ride back to the states.
It is possible that he may know something about the case, but they have not placed him in Colorado at the time of her death.
2006-08-28 09:46:00 · answer #5 · answered by virginiamayoaunt 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The son? You know I was all with you until you said that. WHY would you think the son was part of it? He was a little kid and based on what was released that just isn't logical. All evidence points to the family proably was part of it though. Notice how the police let the father in UNESCORTED and he found her body. Why hadn't the police found it? Why didn't they go in with him? Why was he able to just go around on his own, and that was when the body was found. Maybe the body was hidden.
2006-08-28 09:44:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I definitely think there is something fishy about the whole thing. I also wonder about Burke(the brother)and why they didn't talk much about him.
2006-08-31 16:11:50 · answer #7 · answered by Special 'K' 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, the way eh acted is not like someone who would murder a little girl
2006-08-28 09:46:48 · answer #8 · answered by Kremer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the mother still did it, now she's dead they have to find someone as the fall guy for her aweful crime!!!
2006-08-28 09:43:21 · answer #9 · answered by wolfpack0810 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I certainly feel that either he is a paid scapegoat or a patsy..
2006-08-28 09:41:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋