2006-08-28 09:17:00 · 8 answers · asked by Bathroom Graffiti 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
no worse than guys against girls. or old guys vs. old girls vs. young guys vs. young girls vs. the little rascals vs. oprah vs. tom and jerry..........well you get the idea.
2006-08-28 09:25:35 · answer #1 · answered by big daddy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it is sooo undesirable and so racist in it is very own precise. And there are a lot of human beings and communities who're no longer happy approximately it. And the certainty that Jeff Probst, the host, grow to be attempting to discover the thank you to declare that it grow to be no longer approximately race in any respect, it grow to be purely a contest. it is superb. Why do no longer you publicize lynchings once you're at it! ill motherf-u-c-kers! And every physique on any of those communities that has joined and did no longer or would not get the image or do no longer care, shouldn't learn the "I advised you so" by utilising the a-s-sholes who theory-approximately this theory while between the communities occurs to fail in although stressful situations. ill. What a great thank you to instruct back the hands of time with discrimination. Oh, exhilaration!
2016-10-01 00:27:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think so, Everyone should stop playing the race card, it has gotten so ridiculous. Nobody seems to care that on Family Fued there is always a black family vs a white family so why is survivor such a big deal. If the contestants dont have a problem with it, neither should we.
2006-08-28 09:24:09 · answer #3 · answered by Shorty 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if the partipants wanted to do it... but they didn't even know about it ahead of time. i guess that's the chance you take when you sign up for such a thing. survivor's press release said they did it exactly because there where complaints that minorities where under-represented on the show, but the had much fewer minority applicants. anyway, it's just another "twist" to try to get people to watch. i don't see a lot of signfigance in it.
2006-08-28 09:22:55 · answer #4 · answered by hiddenhotty 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it was a bad decision. It is just a new way to divide up the contestants.
2006-08-28 11:59:32 · answer #5 · answered by lb2006 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everybody is talking about it. So I'd say mission accomplished.
Once the season starts no one will be able to talk bad about it unless they are watching the show. If they are watching the show then mission accomplished.
2006-08-28 09:22:06 · answer #6 · answered by cirestan 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nah...just another way of doing it is all.
Nobody freaked out last year when it was by sex and age did they?
2006-08-28 09:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by Mister Bob the Tomato 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes - it's politically insensitive
2006-08-28 09:23:13 · answer #8 · answered by spaceskating_girl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋