lets say global warming is a farce, who would benefit from it?

Question

reducing pollution on the planet?....benefits everyone.

oh,,,,and the scientists who argue against global warming, everyone of them is taking money from the oil companies. do the homework and learn.

do people honestly think at the current rate the US is consuming natural resources that there will never be a backlash from mother nature?

Answer 1

Hindering the economy is not a viable solution to reducing pollution.

Answer 2

Your points are valid. We have nothing to lose even IF global warming is a farce. A lot of people don't want to think any further than their next tank of gas. The future to them is some far off time that won't concern them so why should they worry about it? It may not be that far off and natural resources aren't infinite. Do we wait until we say "Damn it's all gone, now what do we do"?? Or take a more proactive approach and not let big business dictate the outcome??

Answer 3

There used to be an ice age. It ended because of global warming. This was roughly 10,000 years ago. Which coincidentally is about 10,000 years before the industrial revolution.
The hottest temperatures ever recorded were between 900AD and 1400AD. (again, 800-1300 years before the industrial revolution)
20 years ago all the "scientific experts" were predicting another ice age and suggested we melt the ice caps to avert it.
The Earth warms and cools all the time, humans have virtually no effect on it.

Everyone benefits from cleaning up polution. Only leftist fear-mongers benefit from global warming scare tactics.

Answer 4

the main serious procedures that the folk can attempt against international warming is getting rid of their older style vehicles (1979 Buick) because of the fact, older vehicles emmitt extra poisonous fumes into the air. Its obtrusive that the extra technological progressed a motor vehicle is, the fewer risky gases it emmitts. A motor vehicle that grew to become into geared up 3 or 4 years in the past would be extra economic device friendly than a motor vehicle that grew to become into assembled 35 years in the past. for top populated cities which incorporate ny, Bus and Taxi companys might desire to replace contemporary vehicles with vehicles that are powered by using hydrogen or electrical energy. basically think of, if each substantial city used the Toyota Prius as taxi's, there may well be a decreased point of pollution, and additionally taxi fares might desire to be appreciably decrease besides.

Answer 5

Anyone who believes that man is responsible for global warming needs to eliminate their "carbon footprint" and kill themselves immediately.

If you are not willing to do this, shut up about it.

Forever

Answer 6

I don't get it either. But then again, I stopped giving these people the benefit of the doubt when they elected Dubya for a 2nd time.

Answer 7

Would it make you feel better if it was some other country using all the resources?I bet it would,you anti-capitalist.

Answer 8

yes like who would it hurt to be safer than sorry

Answer 9

al gore

Answer 10

http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg200604210711.asp