2006-08-28
09:01:41
·
38 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Duende71, they kill the babies then throw them in dumpsters so I think you meant, " are you pro LIFE or pro murder" this was a little experiment to see if the promurderers got offended because they KNOW abortion is murder. breaking a child's limbs and skull and throwing them in a trash dump is murder no matter how you try to beat around the truth. Keep trying to tell yourselves otherwise. Maybe it'll help you sleep better at night.
www.abortiontv.com
2006-08-28
09:10:30 ·
update #1
to the coathanger comment: hey, if they want to do something that will kill themselves because they're so desperate to commit murder, they deserve to go through that pain because if the baby will suffer through the pain of abortion anyway, the mother deserves to go through that same pain.
eye for an eye
2006-08-28
09:12:36 ·
update #2
scarlett rose, sounds like you're trying to convince yourself. a person who doesn't believe in murder isn't ignorant and there are several adopted children in my family and a few of their mothers were going to have abortions. I'll send you pics if you like. Good thing they didn't end up getting torn limb from limb and thrown into the trash bin and babydoll, a child's not a tumor and is not aids and is not cancer because none of those have a soul you jackass but keep trying to tell yourself you're right while I just laugh at ya! Peace!!
2006-08-28
09:19:53 ·
update #3
To Paul S, I deleted that question myself because I got a death threat from a devil worshipper!
2006-08-28
13:55:42 ·
update #4
PRo-life!! i would never kill a baby because i opend my legs!
2006-08-28 09:03:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋
With a question like that you're really looking for controversy, aren't you?
I am that rarest of creatures, a pro-life athiest. I don't believe in a god, or souls or any of that guff. As far as I'm concerned we only get one shot at life and I aim to live as long and as good a life as I can.
I think the best way to ensure that the value of my life is respected is to respect the value of *all* human life.
That means not killing anyone unless in self-defence: Not embryos, not convicted serial killers and not even George Bush!
People who talk in cinemas? Well, maybe.
I have yet to hear a convincing arguement as to why aborting an innocent embryo is somehow not killing. Note, I'm not arguing against extreme cases: where the child is a product of incest or rape, or if giving birth may endanger the mother's life, etc. I honestly don't see how those few exceptional cases somehow validate the termination of other lives.
But here's the thing. Everyone tells me I'm wrong, that abortion is about choice and that's it. Well, I'm all for choice, when it comes to paint samples and ice-cream flavours, it turns out choice is a marvellous thing.
What I don't see; what I *can't* see is how that that choice extends to ending another person's life, even if that person is your child.
Especially if that person is your child.
So I choose to value human life.
2006-08-30 07:53:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"because none of those have a soul you jackass but keep trying to tell yourself you're right while I just laugh at ya! Peace!!"
Well, this speaks volumes.
Reported. Again.
I gave you good advice earlier today about how to behave here. If you keep acting like this, you're going to keep having your questions deleted like that last one. It's up to you.
Later:
A death threat from a devil worshipper? I don't believe you, liar. In private emails that you initiated, you said that I was "stalking" you. If I didn't already think that you had a serious behavior problem, that would have convinced me.
2006-08-28 11:19:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Pro choice
2006-08-28 09:04:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Troy S 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
So if someone gets pregnant because they are raped or it is involving incest then it is not murder? What makes it OK under those circumstances? Just for the books, I am Pro Choice, I have no idea and have no desire to judge anyone that thinks there best option is an abortion....I have no idea what is going on in their life that makes that the right choice for them.
2006-08-28 15:50:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am against abortion on demand. Meaning, abortions performed because the pregnancy and child rearing immediately following the pregnancy would be inconvenient are wrong and should be halted immediately.
In response to the young lady who said she may not necessarily have an abortion but liked the idea she had the freedom to make the choice herself, I do not believe arbitrarily taking a life, even if it is an unborn child in your womb, should be left to private citizens to make. There are simply to many other acceptable and preferable means, such as adoption, that can alleviate any stress over the affect an unplanned pregnancy might have on your life.
For the one who commented on the coat hanger abortions, stupid is as stupid does. If some jack a s s does not have enough intelligence to realize using a coat hanger is dangerous as well as incredibly unintelligent, then they deserve whatever happens to them. They should know just from life experience alone, that coat hangers are not designed for that purpose and should not be used for that purpose, without anyone having to explain it to them.
2006-08-28 09:25:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by bowtierodz 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Neither. I'm pro-choice. I personally would not get an abortion, unless my life was at risk or if I was raped or if I knew my child would be a vegetable all their life, but that's just my opinion. I don't support women who get abortions because, "the condom broke" or "I would rather have an expensive car"...well you get my drift. There are usually other options. I DO, however, support abortion if the pregnancy poses a risk to the mother or if the pregnancy is a result of sexual assault, or if they KNOW the fetus will have severve handicapps.
Cheers.
2006-08-28 09:03:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
I do NOT condone abortion as an alternative to birth control. everyone should use protection. but I believe the government has no business saying we have no choice deciding what we do with our own bodies.
do you say that if a women is impregnated due to rape or incest...or if carrying the child to term would result in death of mother or child or chronic birth defects that a woman should still carry that child?
2006-08-28 16:06:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by redcatt63 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm Pro-CHOICE which is NOT anti-life or pro-murder. I am for the right to make my own decisions WITHOUT the interference of the goverment or religion. When are you people going to understand that? Just because a person is pro-choice does not mean that they would choose to have an abortion it just means that they are for being able to make that decision themselves.
2006-08-28 09:06:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by PaganPoetess 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
Pro-choice, and against the reasons (rape, incest, danger to the mother's life, etc) for abortion.
Anyone who identifies themselves as pro-life should imagine their daughter or sister having a very unfortunate circumstance like the ones described above before judging pro-choicers.
Always see the other side. I can, even if I don't agree with it 100%.
2006-08-28 09:06:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I agree with you, scarlett rose is full of crap. and what she is telling other girls about abortions is going to end up hurting them. she doesnt want anyone forcing their beliefs on her, but she can do it until she is bloody blue in the face. what a hypocrite. and all she does is copy and paste, do you have any idea how many times i have seen that tumor and aids crap that she writes. sheesh. the only person she is trying to convince is herself. that's why she has to always write, "my argument wins again." on everything she posts, because she is the only one who thinks that. oh well, what can you do, stupid ignorant people will always exist, right?
2006-08-29 17:41:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by *~HoNeYBeE~* 5
·
0⤊
0⤋