Why don't we just attack North Korea, we KNOW they have weapons of mass destruction.?

Question

Isn't that what this war in Iraq is about,WMD'S? Or is it about Oil and North Korea doesn't have any? Or is about "Iraqi Freedom" like in "Operation Iraqi Freedom"? Or is it about G.W. getting revenge for Saddam trying to kill his father? What the hell are we doing there?

Answer 1

They have a large army, a country that has been bred to hate Americans from the time of birth and no oil.I dont mean hate "Americans" I mean have been taught to live in fear that at any time the big attack could come from America.

Answer 2

North Korea not only threatens the United States with the nuclear arsenal, they are a threat to England, France, Germany, and many other European nations. Even though NK is a communist nation, and their pseudo-communist neighbor China would back them if there was an attack. As soon as the event was over China would annex NK to resolve the instability there. Chinese soldiers and officials were there during the Korean War and after the war to ensure stability so their border would be safe.
As for Iraq, people tend to forget that they did posess a rather large arsenal of chemical and biological weapons. Nukes do their damage and thats it, bio weapons continue to do damage as long as peole can be infected. Also, even though they say there aren't weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they have found spent Uranium rods in the rivers of Iraq. You don't use those to fuel cars or feed your camels.

Answer 3

If we attack North Korea, they might just show us they have WMD by deep frying a few cities on the West Coast, plus the Chinese would come to their aid against us. You think we have immigration problems now? Just wait until a country of a billion+ send their troops over here... What's left of California after the nukes are released will become Chinafornia.

Answer 4

Does it strike you as unusual that the 1st aim of the "axis of evil" grow to be Iraq? properly, what does Iraq have that North Korea would not? Oil is the respond. In Iraq the oil pals of the Bush junta have been given their payback to get their boy into the White residing house. in view that we are already on the brink of Iran, the 2d on the axis-of-evil-checklist, we'd besides invade them too. that would not purely shelter a greater pie of the oil cake, yet might additionally defend Israel from Iran's help of Hezbollah. Why no longer circulate to North Korea you could ask? properly, have they have been given oil? Nope. All they have is a ravenous inhabitants. What might the oil pals of the Bush junta get out of that? no longer something, nada, zilch. each and all the Bush junta might ought to instruct for is a humanitarian disaster on their hands. tens of millions of mouths to feed and electorate screaming with regard to the lack of ability of money into North Korea. Bush won't in any respect attack North Korea, no count how lots nuclear weapons they are going to amass.

Answer 5

!) Kim Jung-Il didn't try to kill Bush's "paw"

2) There's no oil in North Korea

3) China hasn't attacked us yet. *We're more likely to wait "til an enemy isn't #1 on the map before we war with it.

4) Clinton didn't not do anything in Korea, so it won't make the Conservatives drool when Bush gives the command.

There are multiple reasons, and they all lead to one conclusion, Bush is daft!

Answer 6

Coz North Korea has Nukes, the others don´t

Answer 7

didn't we go after Iraq cause they found Saddam was partly behind Binladen?Also if we went after N.Korea we would have an even worse war than we did last time with even more casualties.We don't need any more than what we've had already.

Answer 8

that know walk in the park during the korea the United States lost more men do tothe cold

Answer 9

OK we attack them then China, and Russia attack us. The world will end in 30 minuets if that happens.

Answer 10

NK and China would humiliate the US again, no president wants that on his record.