English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Those substances are classified per their effects: causes "bubbles" (elevation of the skin that get detached and get filled of the fluid or bulla) on the skin, paralyzes nerves, causes internal hemorrhages, suffocates and prevent breathing and causes deterioration of the skin, lungs and intestines, and others that cause several illnesses. Comparing those substances to pesticides comes from the similarities of their effects: they paralyze the nerves, block the ability to breathe and may cause internal hemorrhages and bubbles on the skin.

Have Electro-Magnetic Weapons been used in Lebanon?

Evidence: http://www.uruknet.info/pic.php?f=rma5.jpg

http://www.uruknet.info/?s1=1&p=26044&s2=24
http://www.socialwatch.org/en/noticias/noticia_129.htm

Inhuman, insensate destruction.

2006-08-28 03:09:15 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

The Israeli's didn't use and WMD or chemical agents. The blister agent you're describing sounds like mustard gas or similar substance.

However, the US is investigating whether they used US supplied cluster bombs in residential areas. While not being regulated by treaty, it is generally not done because unexploded ordinance can later detonate kiling civilians. The cluster bombs are released and in effect act like land mines, detonating on contact or when struck or vibrated by a passing vehicle or person.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5286352.stm

2006-08-28 03:27:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Traces of poison

Israel's Dark History revealed.

Israel, not Iraq, holds that distinction of being the first country in the region to use weapons of mass destruction with genocidal intent. Salman Abu-Sitta digs into a dark history

Click to view full caption
Acre Aqueduct feeding the city was poisoned by typhoid injected by Zionists in May 1948
At a time when TV screens are filled with images of perceived weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq among people who are on the verge of starvation, the West turns a blind eye to the first biological terrorist in the Middle East, Israel, where the largest depot of WMD between London and Peking is located.

When confronted with the anomaly, the United States ambassador to the UN, John Negroponti, responds with typical cynicism, "Israel did not use these weapons against its people or its neighbours." Assuming that the ambassador is well-informed, this statement is a patent lie. Israel used biological weapons even before it was created on Arab soil in 1948 and ever since. The purpose, according to Ben Gurion, is genocide, and if not complete, the purpose is not to allow the dispossessed Palestinians to return to their homes.

2006-08-28 09:23:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Israel warned the residents to get out of the area, they were coming in to stop Hezbollah from shooting at them. Hezbollah was fighting without uniform (which commonly shows an authority of a government to use deadly force in a conflict, and separates the fighters from the civilians). Hezbollah was using schools, medical facilities, and mosques for protective cover or active weapons storage and staging (firing) stations. Hezbollah was using individual homes and stores to hide and shoot from. Hezbollah had a network of caves and bunkers to hide in. They would use spotters to radio or telephone orders on hiding and then coming out to shoot at Israelis. They had land mines and booby-traps. Hezbollah was not exactly a bunch of babies playing in a sandbox, these were dangerous people intent on doing dangerous things.

Now, if the non-combatants are supposed to be gone, as the notices were made (they even made phone calls to individual houses, warning them to get out), and those remaining would happily kill the Israelis at the Israelis' most vulnerable moments, what the heck are you crying about? This is war, moron. Wars are dangerous and terrible things. Israel 'went the other mile' to minimize civilian losses, more than any army has ever done in any war I've ever heard of. Hezbollah's little tricks include some debilitating trap and wait for the Israeli soldier to call out for help or yelp in pain, then shoot him in the gut so he dies slowly. Israelis, like Americans, tend to go for head or chest shots and be done with it, not make people needlessly suffer.

You want to gripe about something that is wrong, gripe at Hezbollah for hiding behind women and children.

2006-08-28 03:29:58 · answer #3 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 3 1

There has been no major report of anything but conventional weaponry used. However, the Hezbollah terrorists were using some rocketry loaded with ball-bearings and other special loads. If the Lebanese people had such damage as you describe done to them, it could have been from chemicals which may have been located in the area they were in, but not from the weapons.

2006-08-28 03:27:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There was no need to use any sort of high tech weapons at all they have the only weapon that they shall ever need for their enemies and that of course is the power of God. Once they established their country again after 2500 years of exile they according to the last book of the bible will never be beaten in any war nor will their enemies ever win for they are in the hands of the Lord Jehovah.

2006-08-28 03:50:14 · answer #5 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0 1

What about packing a warhead of a rocket with 1,000s of steel ball barings (in addition to the standard high explosive fragmentation warhead) and launching it into a city to try and kill as many civillians as possible? Oh wait, sorry, that was Hezbollah.

2006-08-28 03:30:45 · answer #6 · answered by Hockey, Guns & Beer 3 · 3 0

I don't know about all that, but I have it on good authority (my uncle's best friend's father's neighbor's sister-in-law's second husband, who used to be a security guard at Graceland - and darn well knows what he's talking about!) that they employed zombies and pirate ghosts!

2006-08-28 03:35:56 · answer #7 · answered by rumplesnitz 5 · 2 1

You are describing mustard gas, and it was not used or the media would have reported it.

2006-08-28 03:14:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I know, they are sick bastards. Yet they have the nerve to call others terrorists. You should see the horrid pictures of the children and what these weapons did to them. It's evil, just plain evil.

2006-08-28 03:17:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

You forgot your tinfoil hat! Hurry, make another!

2006-08-28 03:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers