with a married man ad she somewhat knows his wife (they attend the same church). the wife confronts the other woman who claims their convos were srtictly friendly and was caught off gaurd by how the wife knew about her. the wife and lets her know she has no business talking to her husband etc. the woman apologizes to her at church. wha do you think her intentions were? to take the wife's place, flattery of the attention from the man, or just to have a littel you know what on the side.
2006-08-28 02:09:45 · 16 answers · asked by Skypride 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
the woman's husband left her for another woman leaving her with 3 children so she should know how it feels to have a woman talking to her husband behind her back.
2006-08-28 02:11:02 · update #1
I think the phone conversations were inappropriate, regardless of how innocent they were, it gave the impression of impropriety.
2006-08-28 02:13:42 · answer #1 · answered by Annie R 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It all depends, how the husband responded to the woman, if he was true to his wife, as far as letting her know all that was going on and wasnt hidding anything, and he was always on the up and up with the other woman, theres a slight chance that it was just friendly conversation and she had no interest other then being friends.. but if the husband was hidding the convos from the wife, and was feeding the other woman a bunch of lines, and possibly lies.. then there may of been another agenda going on.. so first id see how the husband responded to the wife right from the start about the convos.. a good husband would let the wife know from the start, and about all that was talked about and SHOULD of even asked her if it was ok to even give this woman their phone number.. But if it was something the wife had to find out on her own about it, that means there are secrets and theres no reason for anything GOOD to be a secret so it would of had to have some other agenda involved.. and she could of done it for any number of reasons, she needed a friend, she was lonely, ego gradification if he was giving it to her.. ect.. so all u really can go on is if it was a hidden relationship or out in the open..
2006-08-28 09:31:16 · answer #2 · answered by brwneyedgrl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Her intentions could have been to have a relationship with the man, or they could be perfectly innocent. The married man was kind to her, and she felt safe because she met him at church, and perhaps he was just being a friend. However, the wife of the married man has to consider that the man also participated in these lengthy conversations, and question him equally. Perhaps he was just trying to help someone in a bad situation out, or perhaps he saw an opportunity. Who knows.
2006-08-28 09:14:53 · answer #3 · answered by GLSigma3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off, what are the conversations about? Did she know this man before she got divorced or did the phone calls just start? Also, don't assume that there is anything going on because they talk on the phone. She may just need to talk to a man to get some advise. So, get the whole story before jumping the gun!!!!
2006-08-28 09:24:02 · answer #4 · answered by truckmama_34 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The conversation obviously infringed on the wife's "territory." Intentions? Hard to judge. The mother may not even know what she would have done had the connection continued. Just because her man left her is no indication that she'd have sympathy for the wife.
2006-08-28 09:17:15 · answer #5 · answered by DelK 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should not have kept it from her. She most likely just needed the flattery of the attention from the man. She did not mean in harm anyone. But if there is nothing to hide then it would not have been kept from the wife.
2006-08-28 09:15:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe that's what she's doing, talking to other women's husbands to see what her spouse was doing to her. Maybe she doesn't care right now. She's hurt and she will talk to any married man she wants too. She may even be trying to show the other woman how she should watch her husband better. Because she didn't watch her husband better. She trusted him. Trust is terrible thing to Break
2006-08-28 09:16:12 · answer #7 · answered by kellyswatsell 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THe wife should have talked to the husband, he is the one leading the divorced lady on.
2006-08-28 09:15:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the woman was flattered that another man was talking to her.Alot of women that have had the ultimate betrayal would not do that to another woman.
2006-08-28 09:14:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She should not be talking to a married man. And the married man should know better. It is his fault for answering her calls. No way around that. He is to blame.
2006-08-28 09:15:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She wants some on the side. And she was also hurt and maybe she thinks this will help her get over the pain she endured. It won't but maybe in some sort of sick way, she feels it will.
2006-08-28 09:13:58 · answer #11 · answered by butterfliesRfree 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋