Within that space of time the UK will run out of North Sea oil and there will be a financial and economic crisis and a political upheaval. And the Government of the day will have to make some sense out of all the budget waste and low-level corruption and high-level scams. And deal with such things as a punitive IHT estate tax system that will fall on everybody living in the Southeast because of real estate price rises.
And meanwhile there will have been devaluation of the pound Sterling, because the dollar will have collapsed due to Bush's wasting of assets (his tax gift to the rich of the Clinton surplus in the Treasury; the indebtedness of America to the Chinese and other foreigners) and all the other messes like Iraq.
The king is for the tourists and to meet foreign ambassadors when they come calling. It doesn't much matter. Except that Charles is an idiot and Camilla is an ugly embarrassment.
2006-08-28 02:10:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In 25 years England will be lead by a King with vision enough to look toward Europe. All of Europe will be fabulously wealthy and the American president will suck up to England because it will be the only country that pays them any attention.
2006-08-28 02:39:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Population growth (Most of them would be expatriates) especially girlz will be 7 times greater then men and that would be good news for all men around the world...ha ha ha
So
Divorce rate would go high
Oil price would reach the peak
Highest percentage of Jobless People
Price hike in all (Especially house and house hold thingz)
As a resultz it'll greately generate more beggers, theives & killers
A Sleeping King similar to Sleeping Queen of now with no ruling power is ofcoz is possible...
2006-08-28 02:38:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
King Charles hopefully
2006-08-28 02:13:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course well have a king within the next 25 years - can you see the Queen staying instate for that long? The question is who willl it be... Charles is getting on a bit himself, and I doubt he'd take the role of monarch, and Camilla's too unpopular to be at his side.
And there's no way we'd get a democratic state either, the royals like their gin/shooting/generally doing nothing too much.
2006-08-28 02:12:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by nert 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes - probably King Muhammed II.
2006-08-28 04:44:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if Scotland gets independence other than that you'll find it will be the King of Britain
2006-08-28 02:52:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Twigs 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes definitely, But it will be William. Probably pretty much the same economic growth slowly rising
2006-08-28 02:12:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by churchls0904 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well if you know what usa will be doing in next 25 yrs then,thats your answer as whatever they do at moment we seem to have to follow!!and hopefully wills for king!!!!!!!
2006-08-28 02:32:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by lilly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the medieval era (center a even as skill a similar difficulty), i ought to assert Henry II. He managed to instill quite some regulation and order on a u . s . that were torn aside by using civil conflict, and he had to conflict his finished existence to do it. his greatest mistake changed into the shortcoming of life of Thomas Becket, which Henry known a humiliating penance for. To forged the internet wider, i ought to assert Elizabeth I, yet she's Renaissance, not Medieval. (Henry VIII, her father, is likewise Renaissance) She cleans up quite some messes at domicile and extremely receives England onto the international state as a important participant. English exploration more beneficial frequently than not began lower than her, which will ultimately bloom into the international's maximum excellent military and an expansive empire (no matter if lengthy after her lack of life - she in basic terms planted the seeds)
2016-11-28 02:23:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋