English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He is for gay rights, would that make him not worthy and unelectable?

2006-08-28 01:46:45 · 14 answers · asked by anitahooker_transvestite 2 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Better ask the powers to be in the Republican Party: Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and the right wingers of the GOP they will decide who gets nominated.

2006-08-28 04:41:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think he could be electable as part of a ticket, that hits many part of the Republican populous. I do not think he is electable as a major candidate for President, but a smart candidate may choose him as a VP.

The majority of us in the Republican party are not uber-right-wing whackos. The majority of the Republican party is moderate to mid-stream.

Hell, I'm a Republican and for 'gay rights' per se. I'm for the equality of all citizens within our conutry. That does not mean I am in support of changing the definition of marriage to appease this vast minority. However, it also does not mean that I think that they should not have the right to be with whomever they choose.

2006-08-28 01:51:55 · answer #2 · answered by DiamondDave 5 · 1 0

no longer something yet a set of idiots on right here, and till now every person pees there pants I’m a registered self sustaining that by some potential looks important for somebody to chat now days. First the bill to help the sandy typhoon sufferers had all style of crap in it from the two facets and that grew to become into from the 1st weeks after the disaster, yet all that grew to become into pulled out and the fuddling grew to become into decrease from $60 million to $27 million and nonetheless no vote the Republicans nonetheless blocked it, then as quickly as returned it went back and grew to become into broken up or maybe decrease returned no longer something grew to become into left they broke it up and can piece mill the help to the Sandy sufferers (how nice of them, to piece out help of the folk’s funds it is set aside for disaster alleviation) so Speaker Boehner promised they might vote on the bill till now they broke for Christmas and new 12 months’s ruin, the senate handed the bill it went to the abode the place Speaker Boehner pulled the bill from the vote asserting they did no longer have time, this grew to become into 2 months after typhoon sandy. So what did they have time for in the time of that important vote that would desire to no longer get bumped to help the folk, • Drywall protection • Frank Buckles WWI Memorial • Redesignate Neil A. Armstrong Flight study center and Hugh L. Dryden try variety • Conveyance of specific sources in Kotzebue, AK All those expenses have been deemed extra important than the those that pick help from typhoon sandy, so then all of the senators went on holiday and did no longer shield the bill till as quickly as they got here back.

2016-11-05 22:49:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

the ONLY way many republicans would vote for Giuliani as president (as vice, it would be different) would be if the democrats ran someone very liberal... like hillary...

a moderate democrat from the south (like edwards or warner) would give him a BIG run for his money... since they are about equally liberal when compared to each other... and people from the south don't generally like to vote for "liberal yankees" as many believe giuliani is...

2006-08-28 01:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hmmmm Giuliani, you mean for president?
quite possible, would like to hear of his other stances though.
if you're asking based Solely upon his stand on gay rights?
NOPE. I dont care if hes for or against, but this country has much better subjects to base a presidency on if restricted to just one topic.

2006-08-28 01:53:59 · answer #5 · answered by digital genius 6 · 0 0

I'd like to see Giuliani be the next Attorney General.

But POTUS? No, he wouldn't be anywhere near my top choice.

2006-08-28 03:27:36 · answer #6 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0 0

Rudy's charismatic and really smart. The man has a great chance.

2006-08-28 01:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by Vosot 3 · 0 0

go McCain! i WOULD vote for him if I was a bible thumper! Go Progressive Republicans.

2006-08-28 01:49:24 · answer #8 · answered by KrazyK784 4 · 0 1

Mighty Eight ball says: ask again later.

2006-08-28 01:57:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah right! Who the hell else would they vote for?! If he's all they got, he's all they got. They won't be worried, they will figure out later how to control him.

2006-08-28 01:49:33 · answer #10 · answered by Brackalicious 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers