include , homosexual relations?
or being homosexual is an anomaly?
2006-08-28 00:47:03 · 15 answers · asked by interested 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Well sexual education should span all aspects of sexuality in some form or so. It's exaclty what it is education, and the more you know, the more power you have to make more correct decisions in your life.
2006-08-28 00:52:05 · answer #1 · answered by rushorty417 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it should, and for a number of reasons. Among them you could include teaching safe sex, since male homosexuals are at greatist risk of contracting AIDS. And the earlier in school the better, since it might help children avoid pedophiles. As to it being an anomaly; current scientific, medical, and psychological opinion is that bisexualility is natural, but repressed in most people, and that those who practice homosexuality exclusively (to include lesbians) are a minority. One could assume this qualifies them as a stastistical anomaly.
2006-08-28 01:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because all these young homo's are being taught to suppress the inevitable. Most lil boys and some girls I know experiment at the height or puberty in some type of homosexual acts while at sleep overs or tree houses and such. Why not educate them early on being safe. Statistically 1 of every 6 people are gay. Lets not discriminate lets educate.
2006-08-28 00:55:43 · answer #3 · answered by david s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should, and should insist that it isn't an illness or a sick mind. I think it should describe heterosexual relationships, where babies come from, how one get pregnant and how it can be avoided, what is an abortion and what are the implications (moral, health, legal), what are the STDs and how they can and should be avoided, what it means to be sexually active and responsible, how to say NO - and also what is homosexuality and how it fits (or doesn't, depending where) in society.
But most schools, countries and societies are afraid to describe even half of the above. It is better to let kids get in trouble than take the pain to spell it out...
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
2006-08-28 01:05:08 · answer #4 · answered by OneLilithHidesAnother 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Frankly, yes... I am personally not bicurious, but I do feel that safe sex should be promoted in both a hetorosexual and homosexual context... Although just making sure youngsters know that sexually transmitted infections can be passed through anal sex - wouldn't necessarily have to be stated in a homosexual context.
2006-08-28 00:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by 8Dave 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Being homosexual is not frowned upon, but I do not know of many schoold athat are that open about it to teach about it, I think it will cause too much of a ruckus out of the PTA.
2006-08-28 00:52:56 · answer #6 · answered by X's Mommy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sex education should be taught that in the eyes of GOD it is wrong, but with the seperation on church & state, it should'nt be a topic at all. Safe aex should be taught on an automatic.
2006-08-28 00:51:41 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, should include. do u know how many kids feel like they are not normal and that they are alone?its important for them to know they are just like anyone else, and for the others to also learn that.
2006-08-28 01:02:47 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it should! It should also states that to be gay is not an offence but a sexual preference. And no i'm not gay myself but i do have a few gay friends who endured sinsults/ beatings etc. Their crime? Their sexual preferences! So you see i think it would be a good thing.
2006-08-28 00:56:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't know what an anomaly is. But I know it is wrong so therefore it should NOT be included!
2006-08-28 01:26:33 · answer #10 · answered by helpme1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋