peace as we know it in the middle east , gave Israel the rights to have arms on the borders of any country and

Question

away the same rights from arabs" egypt-israel 73 peace treaty " , now the question is , how can arabs who are naturaly peacfull defend thier countries , national security can not be gained excpet by millita groups , do you agree?

Answer 1

yes i agree that Israel having entitlements to be on the borders could be a provoking situation leading to Arab millita groups responding because national security is not established. it isn't fair.. the whole situation is unfair on the Arabs. lets hope peace in the Middle East this time actually does mean peace.

Answer 2

Muslims & arab countries should become strong to get all their captured land back & and to live in peace with no fear of outside threats,
They have to have stronger & more advanced armies,
They should grow their own food & never depend on others cause they can & will let u down at anytime,
They should have a big industry ,advanced tech & strong economy
They should make their own weapons by their hands,and have their own weapon manufactures ,like all strong countries do(i.e ,russia ,china,france,,,,,,,,,,,)
The muslim world is very big & rich but needs to be united & organized to reach these goals & return to be the biggest superpower in the world like 500 years ago,
& before all that can happen, all these corupt gov should be changed & other new clean fresh minds & soul come to govern.
This is what i think.

Answer 3

Israel has peaceful (if chilly) relationships with Jordan and Egypt. Israel hasn't invaded them and doesn't have a reason to invade.

The Israeli troops are necessary to prevent groups such as HAM-AZS, the HezBULLies and the like from using these countries as staging areas.

I can't find any references to Egypt or Jordan not being able to have troops on or near their borders with Israel. I've looked at reports of both the Geneva 1973 and Camp David accords. Since you seem to have these sources, please provide them.

----

Also, if Arabs are 'naturally peaceful', please explain:

1. The Iran/Iraq war
2. Iraq's invasion of Kuwait
3. Darfur
4. Targeting of tourists in Egypt
5. Libyan bombings in Germany and of flight 103 over Scotland

I think that you have blinders on when you look at world politics.

Answer 4

9/11 grew to become into no longer the 1st terrorist attack against u . s . of america and heavily isn't the final. we don't might desire to do something to influence terrorists because of the fact this might properly be a holy conflict, and all it takes is the way u . s . of america behaves in accordance to them. we are infidels who have not got a real to stay. we are being infiltrated with terrorists each and accepted and that they at the instant are our buddies, so the conflict will little question be genuine right here till now long. needless to say those liberals who love those human beings and sense u . s . of america is the undesirable guy, won't have weapons to shield themselves the two.

Answer 5

I think that if you study the last 4,000 years of history you will find a basic flaw in the statement "naturally peaceful". This has been the most warlike place on earth for millenia.

Answer 6

No !
All the Arab countries have militaries, so they can defend themselves.
The problem lies with unregulated militias, who continue to attack Isreal, as they have since 1948 .
You can talk with a government and reach agreements, you can't do that with Fanatic Militias.
And it don't help when you have people like IRAN'S VILLAGEIDIOT swearing to wipe Isreal off the face of the earth .

Answer 7

Yeh Sam and looking at the last 4,000 years of history also the most 'civilized'. I agree.... militia groups are the only defence against an military which is funded and supplied by the US

Answer 8

There are two sets of laws in this world.

Laws for America and their allies

Laws for the rest of the world