America enjoyed a few years of peace before Iraq. Can it ever be at peace again after Bush' actions?

Answer 1

it will take a long time (and billions of dollars) for people to forgive america for what they did to Iraq.

Answer 2

Loaded question, and inaccurate.

Clinton kept us in peace, let Bin Laden roam free when he could have had him after 93 bombing. He had the US stand by as 600,000+ Rwandas were killed, and all it would have taken would have been a couple thousand troops. Using Lib logic, maybe Clinton is a racist? Or he did not care because there was no oil in Rwanda.

Do I Believe the war in Iraq was justified? Yes
Do I think the War has been mishandled? Hell Yes

But I dont blame the whole situation on 1 man.
Now is a critcal time if we want to keep Iran out of the situation.
We need a president who is looking at doing the best for the situation, like Lieberman.

Answer 3

As far as I'm concerned a better question is, will Iraq ever be at peace again. As far as I know most Americans still sleep easy at night. That's more than I can say for the Iraqis.

Answer 4

What nonesense! How soon we forget how this war began, and how important this war really is! BUT FOR Clinton's inaction during his administration, President Bush would not have inherited this dangerous situation we are in. Did you already forget the 1st terror attack on the World Trade Center during the Clinton years? How about the attack on the Cole? How about other attacks on U.S. interests during Clinton's administration?

How dare you post a question that is absurd to begin with? It would have been much easier to deal with Islamofascism during Clinton's administration. Instead, that administration did nothing but hubnob with the Europeans, decentralizing the FBI and CIA, and weakening our security.

While I don't agree with everything that President Bush has done, at least he has the courage and resolve to deal with Islamofascism head on. I hope that he deals with Iran, the head sponsor of Islamofascism around the world. Only then can there be a chance for peace in the world.

Answer 5

Bush's actions or terrorists actions? People always tend to blame the reactor and not the main source of the problem. The world we live in today is constantly threatened by terrorism no matter where you go. Could you imagine going on vacation and having your hotel blown to bits? I really do not want to live in this type of world forever, although it's beginning to look more and more like that. Get rid of terrorist and you may have your peace.

Answer 6

True, you were at "war" after 911, but the asker was referring to the invasion of the middle east. The Taleban government was "Harboring" Osama, they weren't actually so much in on the plot. Which was legally sufficient for an attack, anyway, but not really the obvious choice of action.
Iraq... Well, they were supposed to be breaking their Peace Agreement, but... They weren't.

While you have brought countries on their knees, you haven't succeeded with your main objective yet.

Answer 7

You mean the peaceful years when the USS Cole, African Embassies, WTC 93, Egyptian Airliner [downed by copilot]...? Ah yes, the good old days.

Answer 8

A famous and very intelligent gentleman said, Peace is not the absence of war. It is because of war that we have peace.

Think not, you could be speaking British, Japanese, or German. You could be voting for the next confederate president, you could be working for your party leader, you can be bowing your butt down to Allah, you could be strapping bombs onto your kids.

Grow up

Answer 9

Peace what do u call blowing up the twin towers a picnic get a life dork

Answer 10

We were ever at peace after WW1 or WW2 or Korea or Vietnam or any other conflict. Of course everything happens in cycles there will be "peace" and there will be more "war" welcome to human nature