AND LEAVING POOR PEOPLE SUPPRESS DUE HUNGER INHUMAN ACTS .
2006-08-27 20:57:10 · 15 answers · asked by scotlandiii 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, all oil. That is why the U.S. spends so much time supporting Israel, because of its oil. Wait, no, that is not right. The U.S. should support all the Arab neighbors if this was so, given that its support of Israel only brings anger from all the oil-rich nations.
Uh, and Vietnam and Korea, the U.S. fought there because of all the oil and other riches there. Wait, uh, that is not right. Hmm, South Korea has a free country, and the U.S. is stealing exactly what from them?
Somalia is now devoid of all its oil that the U.S. stole. Wait, darn it, they didn't have any oil. (Now, the U.S. failed in its attempt to help them, but the U.S. made an attempt.)
Maybe there's oil in Grenada or Haiti, each where the U.S. has intervened? None? Hmmm. Money? No.
And Cuba, well the U.S. did attempt to topple Castro some forty years ago but failed.
Panama? Now free of a dictator, and the U.S. is stealing all, ahem, nothing there, and the U.S. now pays for rights to go through the canal.
There must be oil somewhere in its foreign policy. Where?
Ah, I got it, Bosnia and Kosova. Man, the U.S. got rich off that! Uh oh, no it didn't.
Afghanistan? Nope.
Iraq? Finally, we found ONE case with oil. But the U.S. did not go for oil reasons, but for other reasons, and have not stolen Iraq's oil. Instead, the U.S. is spending hundreds of billions of dollars--and many soldiers' lives--to bring freedom there. What arseholes.
====
Can the U.S. take on all dictators? Well, certainly not all at once! But, in the long long term, with the help of like-minded nations, this is a worthy long-term goal, both moral because of the oppressed that are freed, and because it leads to greater long-term world stability because freedom-respecting democratic governments almost never go to war against one another.
2006-08-27 21:20:25 · answer #1 · answered by A professor (thus usually wrong) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If ever there was a countries administration that could be given an award for marketing in politics then it has to be the USA. USA is only interested in resolving issues which will benefit her own interests. Unlike middle east countries with their rich oil reserves and plenty of money , the interfering in the affairs of poor african countries wond do any good to the Superpower.
2006-08-27 21:04:44 · answer #2 · answered by Shemeer 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The political system of most of the Non-Democratic countries are Kingship or Dictatorship. All these non-democratic counrties are blessed with natural resources. It is easy for US government to handle / threaten / intimidate / convince (?) an individual to loot the entire wealth of those countries to US rather than convincing (?) / bribing the entire parliamentarians to do that.
2006-08-27 21:06:45 · answer #3 · answered by Best Answer Expert 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two Reasons :
1> No OIL &
2> No Threat to Israiel.
2006-08-27 21:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by Sahil 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it may well be performed at the same time as doing so serves our interests and there is not any passable decision. it may well be considered a transitional section on the some time previous to democracy. Democracy should be restored less than circumstances that want the US. the US could discourage this kind of interest in different international places. we are nevertheless the purely superpower contained in the international. we may be nicely recommended to apply our impact more effective robustly than we were doing, if we prefer to maintain that position.
2016-10-15 21:51:23 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here we go again...when another country needs help, we are always the ones they ask first and the first to be blamed if they suffer. However, when we try to fight terrorism in the world, we are criticized. Make up your minds!
2006-08-31 12:59:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US is only bothered about the oil rich countries.
2006-08-27 21:08:34 · answer #7 · answered by majorcavalry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
US is only after rich countries coz they will buy weapons.US is only after money,any country having oil is its favoruite target.And being so volatile makes gulf countries a soft target
2006-08-29 19:03:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US only goes after countries that have oil. Thats why we dont bother cuba, there is nothing there we want.
2006-08-27 21:03:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the US benefits from dictators and non-democratic countries by not objecting to it's foreign politic
2006-08-27 21:03:18 · answer #10 · answered by dahabawydiver 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋