why do they influence the peace process?
2006-08-27 19:49:00 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
United Nations to mediate between Israel and Lebanon,
United States to stop giving arms to Israel,
Arab countries to halt their support to Hezbollah guerillas, and
All countries to encourage all of the above to end the war.
2006-08-27 20:21:05 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The biggest influence in the middle east is in the hands of the United States since they are the biggest supplier or money and military equipment to Isreal. The influence on the arab side lies elsewhere and this influence will have to be exerted on both sides to make a lasting peace.
2006-08-28 02:57:39 · answer #2 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
G'day Ding,
Thanks for your question.
There are a number of countries in the middle East and elsewhere who can influence the peace process. There are also a number of organisations.
Regards
2006-08-28 02:56:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only Israel can influence that by giving up its aggression and expansions. Arab lands have bee occupied since 1948 and if you look at the map in 1948, 1967, 1973 and 1983 you can see who is killing who!
2006-08-28 03:03:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
United States of America.
Because she has the power in UN - veto, money and power.
But today, all mechanism in White House been unwisely used to spread hatred among the people in this world.
The Jews / Zionist controlled White House, TV station and news agencies in US to condemn or to manipulate the true stories in mid-east conflict.
2006-08-28 03:04:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There cannot be peace. The Arabs want to drive the Jews into the sea.
I'd mind my own business and stay out of there.
2006-08-28 03:16:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both Israel and the Arabs need to give up hostility towards each other in both speech and action, decide to ignore external pressures to be aggressive towards each other and let the moderates on each side take charge.
2006-08-28 03:08:08 · answer #7 · answered by AmIFree 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
US in particular
and Europe and Russia
several key neutral and modest state as mediator can also play such role
2006-08-28 03:04:21 · answer #8 · answered by david w 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best way would be for other nations to stop providing weapons and money to buy weapons.
2006-08-28 03:21:42 · answer #9 · answered by dreamcatweaver 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is like children if you side with one it encourages the behavior .Attention is all that the side seeks and as long as you get idiots (reporters)trying to get air time it will continue
2006-08-28 02:54:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋