Anarchy- I'd be fully represented because I'd only have to represent the one person governed in anarchy- me- and I'm being governed by me.
But Americans are so dumb if we chose any of those we'd end up living in cardboard boxes behind the loading bay of walmarts.
2006-08-27 19:25:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonimo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
None of the options given by you is very attractive. I do not have a problem with an authoritarian government, but I do have a problem with facism. Communism have proven itself not to be a working model. Anarchy is not my style.
Even though it must be the most expensive way to govern, I still think some form of a democracy is best. Most probably in a federal system.
2006-08-28 02:24:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would rather live in Cuba or China...than in Nazi Germany. So I would choose communist. Anarchy would be like living in continuous riot with stealing and violence. Of course, the socialist democracies of Northern Europe are the most humane nations....but they are not on your list.
2006-08-28 02:26:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The United States. It's the closest thing to an anarchy!
2006-08-28 02:21:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chuck Dhue 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
None of the above. I'd prefer to live in a democracy structured and operated in the manner intending by our founding fathers, not in the corrupt, bungling way it is today.
2006-08-28 02:23:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by RG 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
None. I would rather live in a Democratic society. At worst, a Socialist government...
2006-08-28 02:21:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by linus_van_pelt68 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll stay right here wher I am at - in the good ole USA
2006-08-28 02:24:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Coach D. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋