2006-08-27 18:24:29 · 12 answers · asked by james s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No we shouldn't have to both your statements. So what is your question??
2006-08-27 18:27:59 · answer #1 · answered by Coach D. 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When you make a statement that is not a question you start off on the wrong side of everything. No President Bush should not be impeached and the same goes for Iraq.
2006-08-28 01:31:00 · answer #2 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We should have pulled out of Iraq when it was first urgent to do so. Now we have an STD called fascism growing here in America. Got a chicken soup to cure that? I'm guessing most people haven't read the text of the Declaration of Independence.
2006-08-28 01:31:10 · answer #3 · answered by Nick S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
clueless asses. geez.
read other than Faux news?
signing statements that jumped over Congress...thats enough for impeachment. got us into a false pretense war in Iraq. Doing good? Ask an Iraqi. No wait...ask a soldier there.
2006-08-28 01:54:31 · answer #4 · answered by nate 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
humans should impeach bush. troops should be tripled. completely blanket iraq with troops. terminate all terrorists.
secure all borders. make sure terrorists can not come into iraq. then bring troops out. this could be done in 30 earth days if done properly.
2006-08-28 01:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both true, for entirely unrelated reasons.
Impeachment is mandatory where the president has been determined to have committed felony violations of federal law. The US Supreme Court has determined that the president has violated and ordered to be violated several provisions of the Geneva Conventions, which are defined as felony war crimes under federal law (18 USC 2441). Bush has also found by a federal court to be in violation of federal law (18 USC 2511) for his warrantless wiretapping program. And he has freely admitted breaking this law, which is also a felony (50 USC 1809). Commission of any felony is grounds for impeachment.
As far as Iraq, that's a simple matter of common business sense. We're expending huge amounts of resources and costing thousands of American lives to accomplish absolutely nothing, and in the process making the situation worse for the Iraqis. So, continuing as we have been is just sheer reckless stupidity, with a huge cost that gains us nothing.
2006-08-28 01:28:19 · answer #6 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You have not persuaded me. Where did you get the information to make such a concrete statement? Why should we pull out of Iraq and is their evidence to convict Bush? It seems to me if Bush broke any laws he would of already been canned!
2006-08-28 01:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by ronfschmidt 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
it is very difficult to impeach (which by the way means to accuse one of wrong doing or criminal activity) someone that has done a very tough job well. if you could do so much better then you should get off you computer and prove it.
2006-08-28 01:30:35 · answer #8 · answered by justnotright 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
A Statement, and NO and NO anyways Geesh
2006-08-28 01:49:33 · answer #9 · answered by momsapplepeye 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is this a question?
Are you a product of our wonderful failing educational system?
Looks like it to me.
2006-08-28 01:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by pidpit 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Thats a stupid statement not an intelligent question. Now quit sucking your thumb!
2006-08-28 01:28:45 · answer #11 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋