He's a big loser, I agree with you 100%
2006-08-27 18:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gmun 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
I like Michael Moor, That's the beauty of America the Free
Freedom of Speech
2006-08-27 18:22:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by popo dean 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Michael Moore has the guts to show it like it is.
Maybe you only believe that right wing Fox News? That's the joke in this country. Too bad you can't open your eyes and ears and learn for yourself who is the real liars in this country. And it ISN'T Michael Moore.
Who lied and got us in Iraq? Do ya like paying 3 bucks for a gallon of gas? Do ya like having your phone tapped illegally? Do you agree that people can be held indefinitely w/o being charges with a crime and with no access to a lawyer? Try thinking with your brain for one second.
2006-08-27 19:42:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by GoldnHart 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
the problem with WWII is that it grow to be purely looking back that we see the will for it to have been fought, in spite of the undesirable death. It wasn't (for us right here interior the united kingdom a minimum of) purely a query of keeping off a ruthless Nazi tension which grow to be purpose on overunning the completed of Europe and robbing us of our freedoms. It grow to be additionally approximately what those Nazi forces have been *able* of - specifically the Holocaust. human beings in 1940 had no theory that "Herr Hitler", besides as being a crazed megalomanic, grow to be evil sufficient to herd tens of 1000's of individuals into concentration camps and systematically exterminate them. of direction, as quickly as we found out with regard to the existence of places like Belsen, we realised in simple terms how significant this warfare grow to be, in spite of the significant death. Had the Nazis been allowed to overrun Europe, the outcomes could have been far greater severe. Had Michael Moore been around in 1940 he, like many human beings, might probable have shrugged his shoulders and asked why the united states of a needed to get entangled in a eu warfare. of direction, that should have been earlier Pearl Harbour, while the Yanks majorly replaced their music.
2016-09-30 23:42:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He may niot be the best ever, but he sure is a poster boy for Hollywood Douchebag.
2015-04-22 12:47:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by sjinsj 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Irony of the left, and I mean the FAR left is evident in an article writen by a canadian author. He supported Israels action against Lebonon, and he got much hate mail were people accused, as in this is a bad thing, him of being Jewish. They called him many bad and hurtful things. Now the fact is, one of his greatgrandparents was Jewish, which would be enough for Hitler's government to let him go. The left claims it is tolerant and open to other people, and have a penchant for calling people who like to offer up an alternitive viewpoint to their own "Nazis" for infringing on their right to free speech.
Some how there seems to be irony in that. Gosh golly, though, I just can't see it. Oh well.
As for "Angel" well DUH, of course he has free speech. Which means he can say whatever he likes about Michael Moore. I feel you might be missing the point on that.
2006-08-27 18:16:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rae 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
It's right wing extremists like you that make a federal case out of something like this.
I live in America because I enjoy free speech. As does Michael Moore. As do you.
2006-08-27 18:11:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by angel_s_garden 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
I agree that Michael Moore is a douchebag but Tom Cruise isn't so much.
2006-08-27 18:09:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by LalaLola 2
·
0⤊
5⤋
was he the one that made fahrenheit 9/11. that was a good movie
2006-08-27 18:07:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
He's the "best" in the sense of "most accurate example of...", but worst in the sense that his hatred of America, white people, men, etc. gets in the way of the rare good point that he is rumored to have.
2006-08-27 18:09:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Asher S 4
·
1⤊
4⤋