English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Marriage = Man+Woman
Man+Woman = Procreation
Abortion not= good parenting
Two homo daddies not= family unit
Two lez mommies not= family unit
Human + Rover not= family unit

I hate to spell this stuff out for you liberals, but you just don't seem to get what nature is trying to tell you.

2006-08-27 17:48:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

cantcu, I'm sorry if you think nature is fascist? I thought you liberals loved nature and hugging trees? Well, guess things change -- except the family unit and the laws of procreation.

2006-08-27 17:53:17 · update #1

Oh, now nature is racist.. LOLROTF.. Very entertaining. Next thing the liberals will curse mother earth!

2006-08-27 17:54:04 · update #2

surrounded, now that you have brought this up, is it your desire for every child to have a transexual daddy and a shemale mommy? Why don't liberals think of the child?

2006-08-27 17:57:37 · update #3

surrounded, that has yet to be determined. I am strongly thinking about adopting some children along with having some. Finances will permit.

It's called planning...

2006-08-27 17:58:41 · update #4

Wow, justme, will you defend a pedophile?

2006-08-27 18:00:28 · update #5

18 answers

Nobody ever accused liberals of being brilliant. if it's a.ss backward and wrong-they support it!

2006-08-27 18:04:09 · answer #1 · answered by Paul S 2 · 2 4

Ok. I don't agree with you but I'm not here to tell you that your opinion is wrong or that your an idiot for thinking this even though I should since that is basically what you said to me when you asked this question. All I want to know is how does it hurt you if two guys or two girls get married. it is not up to us to judge. God, nature, or whoever else you believe in will do that. Why can't you just let everybody be happy with out critisism from people that don't even know them. What if it was switched and everyone was telling you that how you felt was disgusting and should be outlawed. I'm not saying that you should believe the same way I do that is up to you but why do you have to make it seem that if they don't believe the same as you that they are wrong. Now I am straight but I have gay and bi friends and they are some of the nicest people I know which is more than I can say for you.

2006-08-27 21:30:54 · answer #2 · answered by MJK 1 · 1 0

Marriage = the unity of two people under matramony
Man+Woman = Overpopulating the Earth and inner city schools
Abortion not= aborting your own child
Two homo daddies = my dad's best friend, who raised a much better family then my parents
Two lez mommies= another friends family which was also raised better than mine
Human + Rover not= get lost

What's to spell? What's to fear about change? I could understand being against abortion, but how does a man marrying another man hurt you?

Perhaps it's time you open up your eyes and realize America's no longre ran by witch hunters. We have poligamist mormons who can marry as many, Muslims who can marry up to four, and a gay/lesbian couple that is never going to seduce your children or make you feel sexually insecure. I'm not against the 2nd amendment, but I think it would be a little more safe to allow gay marrages than to allow people to own fire arms.

Extremists like you need to go find a blog full of other exteme conservatives (same goes to extreme liberals). Yahoo answers can do without people who think anyone who is against the War in Iraq should be labled a terrorists or those who hear conservative and automatically think racist/facist.

Grow up or go bother all the other 15 yr old liberals and conservatives who will grow up to worhip Bill O'Reily and Rush Limbaugh. Go harrass all of the 15 yr old liberals who bow down to Michael Moore.

Conservative not= racist/facist/blood sucking CEO
Liberal not= tree hugger/communist/pot head
Moderate not= some one who just doesn't care
Democrat not = too afraid to speak up against arrogant FOX News hosts
Republican not = stupid country hillbilly that doesn't matter

People like you not= capable of actually arguing against any real politician. I bet if you talked to my home senators, Arlen Spector or Rick Santorum, both conservatives, they would laugh their ties off! I bet I, a 19 college sophomore could whup your political nonsense all the way back to your hillbilly boondocks which hunting Ku Klux Klan town down in Hickville Alabama!

I sound stupid? Well if I were a liberal who talked like you, that's how I'd sound!

Get lost John Skerry!

And take all of those other wanna be debators, liberal, conservative, or even moderates like myself out of yahoo answers and leave the answers up to people who actual have open minds and respect for other's opinions.

2006-08-27 18:22:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonimo 5 · 1 1

Actually, you've only listed one thing of the above that has anything to do with nature.

> Man+Woman = Procreation

You need both a man and a woman for procreation, correct.

You also mention

> Abortion not= good parenting

This is true, in the sense that the unborn child gets a raw deal, but abortion may= survival. There are a wide variety of reasons a woman might not be able safely have the child. Left to pure natural cases, that generally means that the woman AND the child just die. You are free to decide if it's worse for one life to be lost or two lives to be lost, but understand what you're advocating.

The other bits, though, have nothing to do with nature, in the sense of producing offspring.

> Two homo daddies not= family unit
> Two lez mommies not= family unit

Either of those pairs will (obviously) produce no offspring, but they may be loving relationships, and there's no reason to assume two same sex parents are incapable of raising an adopted child. Given the biology of people, and mammals in general, there's not even any reason to assume the sexual preference will be imparted.

> Human + Rover not= family unit

Actually a single parent and a dog might well be able to raise a child. Lots of single parents manage without pets being involved, but also many children love family pets. They can be great influences and playmates. In the context of your question, however, you imply sexual relations in an attempt to tie bestiality to homosexuality. I'd guess this is just because you're attempting to insult people, but honestly it doesn't quite work out. You might want to not bother in your next troll post.

> I hate to spell this stuff out for you liberals, but you just don't seem to get what nature is trying to tell you.

Actually, nature generally supports diversity... monocultures tend to die off or change into something else over time. It's especially telling that there are significant numbers of "us liberals" and everyone else, which implies that nature is doing its job, and encouraging everyone to compete and have different viewpoints. While I admit that there are biological incompatibilities in your list, most of your statements are based on assumptions that come from your view of society, rather than nature.

I hate to spell it out for you, but you're making a fool of yourself.

2006-08-27 18:11:54 · answer #4 · answered by Ryan 4 · 1 2

Thank you. I have been saying the same thing for years. Marriage is between a man and a women. If it wasn't suppose to be this way, than procreation would be a lot simpler. Like a women getting pregnant by a women and men being able to have children. But it wasn't suppose to be that way. So, Gays of every sort are against what nature intended.

2006-08-27 18:03:22 · answer #5 · answered by gin 4 · 1 3

So I guess you think every person who has a different way with their lives are some kind of demon. Its fanatics like you that cant seem to figure out that they are a very small portion of the population and feel they should be discriminated against. You all are the true racists

2006-08-27 17:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by trl_666 4 · 6 1

Most Liberals never had a Family unit, they are not capable of valuing it's enormous importance. All they can do is consider their own self importance. They have never had to think of anybody else but themselves. They are a wicked lot they are, and they must be punished, with words of wit and wisdom. For they are truly leturous!

They eat there young, and teach others to do the same.

2006-08-27 18:05:07 · answer #7 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 2 2

We liberals do make things difficult don't we? It's all that "thinking" we do that causes so much trouble. It really would better I'm sure if we just let nature make all our decisions for us like you conservatives do. We really are quite jealous of all of you--in case you didn't know. You all look so contented all the time. You're so cow like--I mean that in a good way. We would like to be more like you be we keep having these things called "thoughts" that just won't let us take things the way they are.

2006-08-27 17:59:18 · answer #8 · answered by Pepper 4 · 3 2

Read the Declaration of Independence.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

2006-08-27 17:52:01 · answer #9 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 4 2

Since you don't think that any homosexuals should be able to have or adopt children, and that abortion should be illegal, I would like to know just how many unwanted kids you have adopted and are raising.

2006-08-27 17:55:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

WOW - I LOVE THIS!
I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS FOREVER!

I am married to the father of my 4 children and we all have the SAME LAST NAME. A rarity in this country now.
Every time we travel I have a hard time with people asking "same last name" for each child when I just TOLD them we are a FAMILY! It MAKES ME MAD that we are not the norm anymore.

2006-08-27 19:19:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers