Adult court, depending on the crime, and a psyciatric evaluation.
I arrest a lot of juveniles who are fully aware of what they are doing, and continue to commit crimes because they know nothing is going to happen.
Juvenile court, probation, and Juvenile Hall are a joke. The idea of rehabilitation is even funnier. I run into the same kids weeks later, usually for more serious crap.
I can arrest a kid for a burglary to a residence, and he MAY spend a DAY. Other crimes, they call the parents the minute they get booked in, to come pick them up. So after I have just filled out an hour of transfer of custody paperwork, and completed a lengthy report, His/Her parents have come to get them, went home, and are probably having dinner.
Just yesterday, Other officers and myself arrested 4 kids for breaking into a Church! they were all 13 and under, with numerous priors for the same crap. That idea of rehabilitation gets people nothing but more trouble, WAY sooner.
2006-08-27 18:08:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by JAG 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The very purpose of setting up Juvenile Courts would be defeated if the Juveniles are transferred to Adult Courts. That said, there is case for examining and settling the practice to be followed when marginal Juveniles are involved--(those within a few weeks of attaining Adult status). There is an entire racket going on in the underworld of recruiting kids of sixteen/seventeen years age , without criminal records to carry out risky crimes such as smuggling of Narcotics and get them arrested , promise families that the case can be fixed through manipulation of prosecution, extract millions as under the table payment and then get lawyers to plead the Juvenile innocence angle. Once the case is compounded with Counseling and reform as the recommended punishment, the kids continuously live under the shadow of the past.
The benefit of Juvenile status should proportionately be reduced as the accused approaches the age of maturity and should not ordinarily be extended to persons beyond seventeen years of age in offences where spur of the moment decisions are not involved.Similarly, in the case of very young adults there should be an element of counseling and rehabilitation introduced when handing out punishment. Where the trial brings out external influence in the crime, the motivators should be more severely punished. cs r.
2006-08-27 18:40:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends!
I think many courts and legislators have over stepped themselves on this one!
In my state you have to be at least 16, charged with a major crime, and meet a 3 point criteria to be sent to a Superior Court! Even then the Superior Court can refuse them!
In some states if they are a certain age they can be charged as an adult, some as young as 14! That is WRONG!!
2006-08-27 17:42:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a hard question, because you just never know if a person is capable of change. For example, an aquaintance of mind is being tried as an adult when he is, in fact, a minor, but he did (allegedly) murder someone, so it could be argued that trying him as an adult is fair. However, I'm not sure that it is fair that, if guilty, he should spend the rest of his life in prison. Before the murder, he was pretty well-liked, even if he was considered odd, and I really want to believe that he could learn from his mistake after... say... thirty years. That may be considered pretty long regardless, but I just don't think that therapy would be lost on him.
So that's my personal point of view; that minors still have time to learn from their mistakes, and specifically, that life in prison may not be the best way to deal with these kids.
2006-08-27 17:49:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Juveniles should be processed in juvenile systems alone. However habitual offenders and borderline juveniles could be tried in the regular courts. Juveniles are given special consideration because they are of impressionable age. If they prove themselves to be hardened then why don't we offer them what they request for... Previous criminal records if any should be given due weight.
2006-08-27 17:48:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Olga 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Juvenile court, juvenile system...
All criminals should be given the opportunity for rehabilitation.
2006-08-27 17:36:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joey's Back 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The 13 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous might stay interior the jurisdiction of the juvenile justice equipment until the criminal age of which they might launch him. it somewhat is regularly 18 or 21, counting on the state.
2016-09-30 01:55:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many kids are put on adult probation for no worse offenses than those on juvie, they can both be on probation the same way. It depends on the courts and judges decision.
2006-08-27 20:46:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by inzaratha 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the seriousness of the crimes against them. If they are accused of several counts of murder then they should definitely be treated as adults.
2006-08-27 19:40:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by LORD Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
if they have done something serious enough to be tried as an adult. yes they should be
2006-08-27 17:37:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by ML 5
·
0⤊
0⤋