Sort of. The deal is, that we´re all smart at some things, and dumb at others.
There are several levels or layers or aspects or whatever you want to call them in intelligence. One is the number solving area. Other in analytical, problem solving, social awareness, artistic, pragmatic, etc..
There are very intelligent people that sometimes do pretty stupid mistakes. This is because their inteligence is very developed for some things and not for anothers.
2006-08-27 16:16:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Roberto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The tests are supposed to be standardized. Before they are used, research has to be completed to make sure the tests are reliable and valid. You could research the exact name of the intelligence test and see how the test scores regarding reliability and validity. This would depend upon variables considered during testing, ect.
2006-08-27 17:26:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are an indicators but not at all exact. They are normed to the "average middle to upper-class white suburban American". Case in point, IQ Question to a 6 year old : Do you walk on the street or on the sidewalk? Answer: on the street. They didn't take into consideration that a child may not live where there are sidewalks and in this case we both lived where you walk in the streets. They also favor people who are highly verbal and do not account for the numerous other ways people demonstrate intelligence.
2006-08-27 16:18:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by cb 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I researched this topic in graduate school. I looked at both the reliability and the validity of most of the standardized tests and was absolutely appalled. On top of that, they are very culturally biased. If you are not white middle class, you are bound to be incorrectly categorized. Educators use them because they are the best tool they have. But in my opinion, the best tool they have would do better underneath the kitty litter box to protect the linoleum.
2006-08-27 18:10:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
a hundred and seventy-a hundred and eighty is intense, it truly is mensa point. yet, considering you ask, no. there's a great variety of factors classic IQ exams do no longer cover, which incorporate emotional intelligence. in case you pick a synopsis of a few of those issues, study some Sternberg who's a maximum suitable researcher into IQ.
2016-11-05 22:25:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by derival 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. My uncle says he has never passed an IQ test, and he is really smart. He is a professor at a Lutheran seminary.
2006-08-29 08:41:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by scubagurl40 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think IQ tests measure capability, not whether or not you're fulfilling it. It's like a measuring cup--it will hold a certain amount, but it's up to you to fill it.
2006-08-28 03:26:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Among other things they can determine whether you match plural verbs with singular nouns.
2006-08-27 17:10:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by old lady 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
gush i hpoe nut!
2006-08-28 11:43:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by kissyoursmelly 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
not really!
http://www.brainy-child.com/expert/accuracy-iq-testing.shtml
2006-08-27 16:14:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by jgreenkc@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
1⤋