I think four arms would be much more useful. Just think what you could do ... coffee in one hand, book in another, telephone in the third, and remote in the fourth!!
2006-08-27 15:13:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Without a doubt, four arms. I have three kids so I often need more than two arms. I like walking upright - so I'll pass on the four legs.
2006-08-27 22:13:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by BabyRN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Four arms to do a lot at one time
2006-08-27 22:13:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by classy chic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
4 arms
2006-08-27 22:19:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by should i ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women always call men dogs, so I rather have four arms.
2006-08-27 22:13:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by willno74 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Four arms is four birds at every thing you dislike in the world...
2006-08-27 22:14:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by notmuchanextrovert 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
umm rather have 2 arms and 2 legs there you go
2006-08-27 22:44:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yeny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
In zero-gravity, legs are useless but four arms would be handy.
2006-08-27 22:12:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jay 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
four legs,
if possible, I'd exchange the extra 2 legs to an extra brain
2006-08-27 22:52:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dream.Big 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
four arms, twice as much you could get done
2006-08-27 22:14:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by corry692001 2
·
0⤊
0⤋