English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-27 15:09:51 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Friends

22 answers

I think four arms would be much more useful. Just think what you could do ... coffee in one hand, book in another, telephone in the third, and remote in the fourth!!

2006-08-27 15:13:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Without a doubt, four arms. I have three kids so I often need more than two arms. I like walking upright - so I'll pass on the four legs.

2006-08-27 22:13:04 · answer #2 · answered by BabyRN 5 · 0 0

Four arms to do a lot at one time

2006-08-27 22:13:34 · answer #3 · answered by classy chic 3 · 0 0

4 arms

2006-08-27 22:19:41 · answer #4 · answered by should i ? 3 · 0 0

Women always call men dogs, so I rather have four arms.

2006-08-27 22:13:20 · answer #5 · answered by willno74 3 · 0 0

Four arms is four birds at every thing you dislike in the world...

2006-08-27 22:14:45 · answer #6 · answered by notmuchanextrovert 2 · 0 0

umm rather have 2 arms and 2 legs there you go

2006-08-27 22:44:09 · answer #7 · answered by Yeny 2 · 0 0

In zero-gravity, legs are useless but four arms would be handy.

2006-08-27 22:12:57 · answer #8 · answered by Jay 6 · 0 0

four legs,
if possible, I'd exchange the extra 2 legs to an extra brain

2006-08-27 22:52:17 · answer #9 · answered by Dream.Big 4 · 0 0

four arms, twice as much you could get done

2006-08-27 22:14:52 · answer #10 · answered by corry692001 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers