It's a combination of things
There have been a few trade and security unions among countries that have seemingly developed behind the public's back. IE, the American Union and the European Union. For details just search on both of those and you will see the what countries are in the unions and what they do.
Then there is the new global market. This actually started in the 90s with the development of the WTO, the world trade organization.
Both of those are leading us to complete globalization. That is basically where each nation's market at home will come second to the world market. That is why you are seeing the republican party not trying to control illegal immigrants... they want the cheap labor to be able to compete with other corporations on the global market.
All of those are pieces of the New World Order which leads me to the answer of your question. The New World Order is a group of nations that will control the world by means of force, monitoring actions and religion.
Force - the goal is to take control of all nations that are in defiance of this new world order.
Monitoring - civil liberties are being taken away on a weekly basis and as long as we are in 'wartime' the president of the USA has authority to disobey any law he wishes. He has also signed almost 800 executive orders since being in office. These bypass congressional approval. He has done these in order to move the world towards Christianity also.
Religion - Do a search on executive order 13397. This is a recent executive order that creates a Faith Based Initiative Center within the Homeland Security Department. I recently met a friend on here from Kashmir and he said they have actually had Faith Based I. ppl there with funding... but the funds come with stipulations that you will convert to Christianity.
The end goal of a new world order is to have one governing power or government. The problem with this is that this government is not elected officials but based on the countries involved... like I mentioned above. And basically this group of nations will gang up on any nation that doesnt agree.. either by force or by sanctions, etc...
To me the meaning of democracy is a world made up of all different types of governments. Once we have one world government, we will have lost democracy forever.
2006-08-27 15:19:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's very similar to the new world order envisioned by the Nazis before World War II. Prescott Bush was a Hitler supporter. Go look it up. The right wing has always been there, in power and out. Fascism, nebulous as it is, is always an attractive alternative to popular rule. To Govern is to Rule is their motto. It's not so much about money as it is about power. Globalism. The Project for The New American Century (PNAC). Maybe I'm not being exact enough.
2006-08-27 17:12:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
A phrase the first Pres. Bush coined after the fall of the USSR. When all the satelite countries broke away from Russia. The emergence of the internet. The problems with ethnic groups that were held in check, like Yugoslavia, during the Warsaw Pact years now were set free again.
2006-08-27 15:13:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by da_hammerhead 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is the group of globalists that own the major companys of the world and influence policy everywhere. The people who help to create wars to gain more money.
2006-08-27 16:26:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by trl_666 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its the same as the old world order only newer.
2006-08-27 15:08:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NWO was a wrestling organization set up my Vince Mcmahon that repopularized wrestling back in the late 1990s
2006-08-27 15:08:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by billyandgaby 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A one world government.
http://www.geocities.com/kosmicphun/government-nwo.html
2006-08-27 16:25:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by hexa 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's a government that runs the whole world. Kind of scary sounding to me. Don't think it will ever come about though so no worries.
2006-08-27 15:12:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by crusinthru 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've heard people referring to the new middle east....one where Arab countries no longer fear Israel's military....and Iran emerges as a new power but I haven't heard of new world order.
2006-08-27 15:07:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brand X 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
are you able to think of an "Iran of the international"? How some "China of the international"? Or an "Egypt of the international"? do no longer assume the U. S. may well be in can charge or that persons of the international might stay under our regulations. now's it nonetheless so super of an concept to you?
2016-11-05 22:19:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋