The United Nations International Force for the Israel/Lebanon conflict (UNIFIL) is supposed to be neutral. During the recent war, however, they were posting information about Israeli troop movements, but not Hezbollah. What gives? A tad bit unethical isn't it?
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/012/622bqwjn.asp?pg=1
2006-08-27 14:37:08 · 10 answers · asked by Rabbit 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The UN is a third world organization. They are anti-USA and anti-Israel.
2006-08-27 14:42:03 · answer #1 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because Israel is the state and gives propaganda information. Hezbollah is a guerrilla, they can't.
The article you post says they posted information about past events, I think it was not good information for Hezbollah to know that the night before they got destroyed some units by the IDF.
Just remember this kids. Blame everything on the UN.
Without them, there would be no Israel in the first place.
Without them, the world can go to war easily against Israel.
2006-08-27 21:47:24 · answer #2 · answered by Amir82 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN is often seen as anit-Israel. I don't consider your source credible, however. Now if lefty organizations such as CNN or BBC would cover it then I'd pay a bit more attention.
BTW, with all of the corruption, waste, and sex scandals that come along with the UN, would acting unethically surprise you? I EXPECT them to act unethically.
2006-08-27 21:43:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN is greatly anti-Israel. It is filled with thugs and dictators from all over the world. It is a useless organization that does not enforce its own sanctions.
It is filled with terrorists trying to legitimize their violence. The UN is very gullible and lacks any kind of backbone to stand up to these thugs.
2006-08-28 00:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by Christopher 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hezbollah is not an official military force. There are no actual "troop movements" to be informed about.
A tad bit unethical? **** no, you little toad. How about U.S.A. supplying Israel with military funding and modern weapons with which they are perpetrating GENOCIDE? A tad bit unethical, don't you think?
2006-08-27 21:54:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
The UN is a worthless organization and should be disbanded. The UN is anti-Israel and pro terrorist and is really corrupt.
2006-08-27 21:41:38 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
the UN was trying to even things out. Since Hezbollah is so incompetent they felt sorry for them.
2006-08-27 21:41:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Europeans are usually anti-israeli. Mainly because Israel doesn't give a crap out civilian casulties.
2006-08-27 21:39:48 · answer #8 · answered by Roger Y 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
because they didn't know where the hezbollah where exactly.
2006-08-27 22:15:38 · answer #9 · answered by sikn_shadow_420 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the leaders of the U.N. are racist.
2006-08-27 21:39:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋