circumcision and sex?

Question

I've been told "There will be more "friction". (with a circumcised) The entire length of the circumcised penis will move across your genitals whereas the uncircumcised penis will "glide" in an out under the foreskin." Is this true and which feels better?

Answer 1

Condoms will make circumcised and uncircimcised penises feel the same in the vagina, but without the condom the thrusting style is different for circumcised and uncircumcised men. Circumcised men will thrust longer and more strenously because they need to maintain stimulation of the glans of the penis in order to achieve orgasm, whereas the uncircumcised man will thrust shorter and more gently because his foreskin itself is erogenously sensitive and allows the glans to be more sensitive. The uncircumcised man will thrust in and out of the foreskin while inside the vagina, stimulating the glans on the in thrust and stimulating the foreskin, the frenulum and coronal ridge of the glans on the out thrust. The shorter thrusts allows the penis to maintain a pretty much constant contact with the clitoris, which will speed the way to orgasm for the woman. The circumcised man will not be able to maintain the steady clitoris stimulation because his thrusting strokes are too long and too far from the clitoris.

Answer 2

My first husband was circumcised and my husband now is not. It has nothing to do with the fact of being circumcised or not, it's all got to do with if the man knows what he's doing or not. Let's put it this way, my first husband did NOT know what he was doing. My husband NOW definitely DOES know.

Answer 3

wrong, and wrong:

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more smegma because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if phimosis occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circunsized men will have to deal with disconfot and dry glans.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a big uproar about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parents decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him?.
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

Answer 4

So much friction that one of my OB/gyn's told me my dysparania (painful sex) and chronic yeast infections were because I need to use a special lube due to husband being cut.

You know a body part is great when it causes such a riot! You don't see people hotly debating gallbladders.

Answer 5

I am circumsized..and I have known no difference...but my freind from Africa is uncircumsized and he says it is much better for the male....I really doubt that...but that is his claim...Africans are adament about not liking circumcision...Bill Clinton says at the AIDS conference in Toronto that males should be circumsized to help protect against AIDS...go figure.

Answer 6

If its the ' friction feel' ur looking for there are condoms,very coarse,that will give you all the friction u want.

Answer 7

I have no clue. I have only been with my husband and he has been circumcised.