does circumcision matter?

Question

I've been told "There will be more "friction". (with a circumcised) The entire length of the circumcised penis will move across your genitals whereas the uncircumcised penis will "glide" in an out under the foreskin." Is this true and which feels better?

Answer 1

The differences from man to man are probably greater than the differences between mutilated and intact. And there seems to be general agreement that chopping off some of his equipment makes sex less pleasurable for the male.

It is a barbaric and anti-sex practice that should have died out long, long ago. Would you cut off your arm to make it easier to wash your armpit!?

Answer 2

I hate to tell you, but asking American girls this question will never yield you an honest, or well-informed answer. There are only two countries on the planet that routinely mutilate baby boy's penises: Israel and the United States. In Israel it is done for religious purposes, but in the United States the history of circumsicion is far more barbaric. Initially introduced as a means to prevent masturbation in teenage boys in the 1800's, the reasons and excuses for circumsizing have changed, and ranged from the bogus argument that it's "cleaner" (no longer medically accepted), that it "reduces disease" (another debunked myth), and finally, the truth behind it rests with the multi BILLION dollar foreskin trade that exists within the medical community and pharmacutical companies. That's right, for every foreskin they lop off, the doctor sells it for over $1000 US, for each one. Those foreskins are used to develop creams, lotions, and other pharmacutical products for consumption. At one time, circumsicion rates in the US were as high as 90%, but they've since fallen to about 60% nationwide.

The problem, you see, is that American woman (as well as men) have been conditioned and brainwashed into believing that circumsicion is normal, that's the way men are supposed to be, that it's healthy, that it's clean, and most American women have never seen a natural, intact penis. The are grossed out and horrified when they first see it, because it's human nature for the ill-informed to be frightened by things they have no knowledge of. Since they've never seen on, they've obviously never touched one, smelled one, or had sex with one, so their opinions are utterly meaningless. Watch them give me a thumbs down in rage, as they hate the truth being told, they hate being embarassed for their own lack of knowledge and understanding.

The truth is, when women have been with BOTH cut and uncut penises, that women overwhelmingly prefer the natural, intact penis to the mutilated one. We don't often see these studies published in mainstream American journals because the results of those surveys make the majority of American men who lack a foreskin feel inferior. Yet, they ARE inferior. They are missing a critical part of their sexual anatomy. It is critical not only for men, but for women as well. The foreskin keeps the glans (head) moist, like the mucus membrane it was intended to be, it produces copious amounts of lubrication to make intercourse easier, it is enriched with thousands of sensitive nerve endings for pleasurable sex, and it contains pheromones which increase sexual attraction in the opposite sex.

Answer 3

No, that is incorrect. But most importantly:

RELIGION--If God intended boys to not have "skin" He would have made them so.
http://www.nocirc.org/religion/

HYGIENE--Use a new invention, soap and water!!! Women produce much more smegma because of physiologic and anatomical reasons, and how would you feel if they cut your vulva lips??? Women, why don’t you answer my question, are you afraid? Baby girls are more likely to get urinary tract infections and no one suggests we surgically alter them at birth to reduce the risks! Just one of many double standards and laws that always treat men worse.

MEDICAL REASONS--No medical reasons. A extremely small chance of a complication do not justify the removal of the foreskin, if so, why don't we remove the tonsils and the appendix when a child is born, and the chance of complications of the tonsils and the appendix is much greater. Talking about complications, in fact many baby boys die each year from circumcision and related complications.
EVEN if phimosis occurs, instead of chopping it off like barbarians!, use Conservative Treatments like:
-Topical Medication(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Dilation and Stretching(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Combination treatment(non-traumatic and non-destructive)
-Preputioplasty is the medical term for plastic surgery of the prepuce or foreskin(many methods).
If you want more detail on Conservative Treatments, go here:
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/

SEX--Foreskin actually enhances the sexual experience for men because it constantly moves over the head of the penis causing more friction and pleasure. Men will also lose much sensitivity to the glans if circumcised.
Circunsized men will have to deal with disconfot and dry glans.
The foreskin have those functions: protective, erogenous, sensory, and sexual physiologic. After all, why would you want to lose all of those “Meissner corpuscles”, the same nerve complexes which provide fine touch to the fingertips?
It is there for many reasons, that is how a man should be(it is natural).
If women like it better circumcised because it looks better(strange, not natural) or gives them more sexual pleasure(strange, not natural), then too bad, they do not have the right! All men do not like mutilated vulvas, and all men like breasts with nipples, they do not like mutilated breasts, etc, etc, etc, because that is the way those organs are supposed to be, it is natural. Interesting, isn’t?!!!

If that was a common practice to do that to baby girls, all the women would be in a big uproar about it(and men too!, men are not like women), but it’s ok to mutilate little boys. The great majority of the ones that agree with circumcision are women for their stupid selfish reasons. Even court cases reported in which mother and father fight because the mother wants to mutilate the son, it is always the mother!. You women should be ashamed to that to your son. Men that are not circumcised, will not get circumcised when adults, they would scream, kick, fight and run, if someone tries to mutilate their privates area, just like you women would run too if someone tried to do that to your labia. Men that where circumcised do not realize what they lost because never had one, and most of them that do realize try to justify it so they do not feel bad about it. Many circumcised men feel very bad emotionally because of what was done to them to such a private area.
It is mutilation of defenceless children in the most private spot, genital mutilation.
It is cruel and barbaric.
It is a human rights violation.
It is not the parent’s decision; it is the parents decision if they want to abuse him, rape him, or to kill him?.
I do not even agree that it is ok if an adult man wants to get circumcised. I think it is wrong, because if a man wants to lose a finger, the Doctor can not do that to him. Think about it, think, think. And by the way, adult men that decide to get circumcised, do it because they know most women like it, they just do it to be more accepted by women.
I think it is just like slavery and all other barbaric acts of the past, it was accepted because it was common practice or tradition, everyone accepted slavery without questioning the facts, but it is not accepted anymore in a modern and fair and civilized society. Circumcision must not be allowed, BY LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many other reasons not to do it, check it out:
http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/
http://www.cirp.org/library/treatment/phimosis/
http://www.circumcisionquotes.com/boydies.html

Answer 4

It is personal preference. We had our son done as my hubby was and it was what he wanted. There have been some things mentioned that uncircumcised men will have more of a chance of urinary tract infections and penile cancer..... However, there are so many opinions that it is best to choose one that suits you!

Answer 5

its mainly done for sanitary resons. and personally i feel alot better about having sex with guy who has been sniped than guys who arnt cause just thing about all the fungi that could live under that skin if the guy dont wash it properly
EEWWW

Answer 6

yes. very. i heard pple can die from it if its not removed. when they cut they take something extra away. if i have a boy theyre getting circumcised.

Answer 7

personally, tha uncircumcised...but its different for everyone..