So did one man out smart and embarass the CIA so badly that they just gave up or is that portion of the show over so we can start a new man hunt for justification to invade someone else who doesn't have WMD ?
Other reports suggest AlQuadia could not have pulled off an operation as big as 9/11 - US inteligence seems to only fit the forign office and it's plans of corperate expansionisim doesn't it.
Updated: 8:06 a.m. ET July 5, 2006
NEW YORK - The Central Intelligence Agency has closed a unit that for a decade had the mission of hunting Osama bin Laden and his top lieutenants.
So why is the US of A giving up - ?Maybe he didn't do it Maybe he is on the CIA payroll What do you think?
2006-08-27 13:07:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I always get a thumbs down on my responses regarding Osama, probably because people think that I'm a raving lunatic. Here is my humble opinion:
Osama has been captured, but being held in captivity until mid-October, to help the republicans hold the house in November.
Sure, it sounds crazy, but think about it. Bush will be impeached if the Democrats regain control of the House and Senate, there is no question about it. He should be pretty worried about now, and if he has the power to do anything, we have already seen that ethics won't stop him!
2006-08-27 13:16:16 · answer #1 · answered by powhound 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because Bin Laden works for the U.S. government. They used that as a way to get into the middle east and rape it for oil. I'm sure there is more to it then that. But Osama is not real, The Bush family is good business friends with the Ladens.
2006-08-27 14:48:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How do you no they have given up, their not going to fill you in on what is going on behind the sense, maybe their using other methods and another agency you don't no about, that is the last thing they want to do in let the American public or newspapers no what is going on, just look at what the New York time did they would have their mouth stretched. The government have their spyies in different countries so you don't no what they are doing, or how close they are to getting him.
2006-08-27 13:33:06 · answer #3 · answered by hexa 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think Osama is on the CIA payroll, but I do think is was behind the attacks. As for him getting away from the CIA it is not the first time the CIA has failed in its intelligence.
2006-08-27 13:45:01 · answer #4 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The progressive: Do you recommend that Congressman Charlie Wilson's shipment of palms and components to the Taliban, to assist interior the combat to get rid of the Soviet occupying tension in Afghanistan wasn't a sort a investment to the Taliban? To this very day, and while our troops have been interior the area, those very weapons have been used against us. somebody desires to learn extra history.
2016-12-17 18:15:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's real simple. If Bush co wanted Osama captured they would have done it at Tora Bora. But the let him slip away. Why? Because he's more valuable alive then dead to the war mongering republicans.
2006-08-27 14:18:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Something funny going on. How come we haven't heard much about Saddam lately?
2006-08-27 13:13:19 · answer #7 · answered by quatt47 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Saddam court case is taking up too much of American time.
2006-08-27 13:10:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
You know...all of your questions are starting to sound alike, lefty.
You SHOULD move to Iran.
Thats not what I think, thats what I know.
2006-08-27 13:10:39 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Ask G.W.
2006-08-27 13:13:31 · answer #10 · answered by MrsMike 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋