can you explain what this quote mean in a simpler way ? " two wrongs doesnt make one right "?

Answer 1

if some1 does somthin bad 2 u getting even will only cause more problems even though it feel good to get revenge

Answer 2

it means that two wrong deeds will not correct one wrong deed.
For instance if person A did something to cause distress to person B. The problem will not be resolved by person B doing something to cause distress to person A. this would be a 2nd wrong doing, so therefore, two wrongs do not make a situation right.

The english language is full of such sayings, they are called "proverbs" ( nothing to do with the Biblical proverbs)

Answer 3

The quote is "two wrongs don't make a right" what it means is if someone does something to you doing something back to them does not improve or make right the situation. Ex: If your mate cheats on you and you cheat in retaliation it just means that you are both wrong.

Answer 4

If I do something to you which you perceive as wrong e.g i steal you watch (first wrong), you stealing mine or someone elses watch (second wrong) will not bring out something positive out of the situation, because we will go in an endless cycle of stealing and revenge and even worse. Whereas if I can front you nicely (do a right) then something positive can happen e.g you I explain why I took you watch and promise not to do it again.

Answer 5

actually the quote is "two wrongs don't make a right"...at least as I've always heard it.
To me it means simply that if you are treated badly, that doesn's justify you treating someone badly in return. Wrong behavior is always wrong, no matter how you may feel provoked!

Answer 6

opposite to frequently used theory this utilization isn't lazy or indecent neither is it as contemporary as a lot of you seem to think of. a minimum of as a techniques lower back via fact the time of the yankee Revolution pls or plz substitute into used as against please in correspondence , lower back after the creation of the telegraph, and maximum recently with the creation of textual content cloth messaging, and inquisitive on the subject of the identical reason, value. for the period of the early days of our united states of america the two paper and ink have been high priced, so there have been frequently used techniques of abbreviation to cram as lots concepts right into a letter as accessible pls (or plz) substitute into one occasion of this. while sending telegrams you have been charged by making use of the be conscious (as in typing each and every 5 characters not particularly words) so as quickly as lower back pls substitute into used (between many different shortcuts u for you etc) to make the sending of a message as value-effective as accessible. As for textual content cloth messaging, while first presented, you may remember, we've been charged in line with message we despatched, so reducing letters out of messages meant a single textual content cloth ought to be despatched as a replace of two. It grew to alter right into a habit that carried over onto the internet, even however the desire for the abbreviation no long exists,,,,to be honest however i'm particularly particular you variety ok or ok as a replace of Orl Korrekt that's the severely frequently used unique word the abbreviation got here from, so are you able to particularly solid stones?

Answer 7

It is actually, "Two wrongs don't make a right". It means ,If you are wronged by someone, doing something wrong back is not right.

Answer 8

It means that just because someone does something bad to you, doesn't make it right to do something bad back to them.

Even simpler: Revenge is not the correct thing to do.

Answer 9

It means that if someone wrongs you and you turn around and do something wrong it return it don't make your action right. Revenge isn't the answer.

Answer 10

revenge isn't the way to go

BUT in the Null hypothesis experiment a good mnumonic is two wrongs make a right- as the H 0 correct box meets the reject H0 row as the correct decision

didn't expect you to know that

Answer 11

when someone hurts you and you try to have revenge, it only makes the situation worst, therefore trying to make someone pay for what they have done to you only shows that you are no better than that person and this will only lead to more problems. So instead of trying to be revengeful and angry try to be the one who avoids the confrontation and the one who mellows out the problem, it's like this you can't fight fire with fire, you have to get something to cool it 'water'.