Isn't it the same thing we do in the privacy of our bedrooms or where ever? Most adults have "recreational sex". So, Isn't it hypocritical to pass moral judgement on someone who does the same thing you do only in front of a camera and/or for an audience?
Most of the movies (even some TV shows, like soap operas) have explicit sex scenes in them. How is having adults having consentual sex in front of a camera and a willing audience wrong? Is it because it causes arousal in the viewer? So who's wrong, the doer(s) or the viewers? Are not male and female genitals openly displayed in museums and art pieces?
I'm not a porn advocate or a pervert and I certainly don't support sex among or with minors, animals or against someone's will. So don't even go there. I'm merely asking these questions for feedback.
2006-08-27 12:36:59 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Other - Entertainment
Well. I get turned on by touching mannequins in American Eagle. There are certain things that arouse me, porn is sometimes one of them. Bad porn is just a joke, and sometimes I watch the Hotel Erotica series with my friends or my boyfriend for a good laugh.
I dont think porn is wrong at all, its human nature and while sex can be dangerous (I mean STD's or unwanted pregnancy) it's still sex and its still enjoyable.
Nobody's wrong... Someone is simply doing our horny society something to enjoy (whether its laughing or something else) by letting people film them having sex.
2006-08-27 13:01:06 · answer #1 · answered by Megan S 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
2
2016-07-19 07:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pron is different from sex in your bedroom for a miriad of reasons. but few of them have anything to do with what you're asking here. Sexual content in movies and TV are not the same because while it is purient it is not explicit. However Porn's strongest antagonists also favor stricter TV Censorship and burning museum art that offends their sensible tastes. There are usually 3 camps of objection to porography.
1. Control. When you're at home in the bedroom having sex you have some control of your children watching you. When those same acts are on a DVD they can be watched outside of your supervision where you can explain them.
2. Perversity. Many of the acts performed in pornography are not those performed in the bedroom consistantly, some are not legal to be preformed in the States the porn is distributed in.
3. Jealousy. It is the battle cry of every woman who neglects her man sexually "I SHOULD BE ENOUGH FOR HIM!" women who don't offer their man satisfaction often enough (read just about all) are greatly threatenned by pornography and the errosive effect it has on their ability to control their mate.
2006-08-27 13:00:06 · answer #3 · answered by W0LF 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well in porn there is nothing but the sexual arousal there is no story and no real sense of timing its just watching sex to get aroused. and just in front of a camera is a little naive. it takes a large crew to really shoot most of those scenes and a really good editing crew to patch it all together. so its not just the people doing the thing and a guy with a camera. it a little more exploitative than that try at least three guys with video and maybe a couple with stills and a director and then you have the standard gaffers and electricians and lighting.
2006-08-27 12:40:53 · answer #4 · answered by gsschulte 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Listen you make valid points but you're making more of a blog here. Try to keep your question simple. However I think I will answer it the best I can for you. Society in general will have certain moral standards that they consider okay, and this is really a matter of perception. So Porn as you call it is straight up, but then you have 'ART' and the public perception is that it is nothing sick or perverse that it is art. If you find yourself not liking this art or shows etc, you may want to limit your exposure to them, get internet filters, parent block for cable or dish tv, oh and stay out of museums and galleries. LOL. Good luck to you.
2006-08-27 12:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by jprofitt303 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your right porn is simply sex infront of the camera. Most lovers / partners etc do have sex infront of the camera, hence the name 'home porn' etc.
I also do not agree with animal sex, minor sex is wrong very wrong and against someones will is so wrong too. A home porno movie is ok when both agree to it and its not shoved onto the web etc. Its kept private. Its important to remember thro that most say bad things about porn as its shoved in our faces and on google searchers that have nothing to do with what the kids are looking for. Know what i mean
??
2006-08-27 12:41:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word "porn', like "art" is open to a wide array of interpretations. Traditionally, porn related to depiction of people who perform sexual acts for material gain - not necessarily performing in the pictures, often merely posing with not much on. Having sex in front of a camera may be contributing to the creation of erotic material for business purposes, or for the buzz. By letting our choice of words depend on the attitude of the performer we are not much the wiser. The motivation of the person paying for/organising the production is a better indicator of whether a piece of visual art is porn or just hsifoac.
2006-08-27 12:48:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a die-hard Prude. & proud of it.
I dislike Porn, won't even watch supposedly soft-porn.
Porn degrades a beautiful act & demeans it.
I'll switch the TV off rather than watch something that isn't at all nice let alone entertaining!
Nude art I find worthless, there R better things 2 "copy" than the human form.
& 4 the last time, the demand 4 more degrading/more Explict Porn is spreading Aids/HIV quicker than any other way!
Only takes 3 Positive HIV tests B4 suspended but 4 times B4 they R banned from Peforming!
4 times & god knows how many they've infected.
Nasty & fatal
2006-08-27 12:50:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well it is more over the top - you never see stuff like porn in moveis or tv - ever. And the noises etc -- toys, all of it - it is over the top.
It also depends on ones view of sex - some people see nothing wrong with it - some countries make it a lifestyle so it depends so if you see it like that, then that is you and that is your right nd your understanding of it.
How I see it is that those people are choosing to sleep with an enormous amount of men and women and take money for it - and show their bodies in this act to everyone - for cash. It is not like us having rec sex in our personal lives - it is for sale and all over. It is impersonal, bought, sold, and some of it is pretty tasteless actually. But people like it and people buy it. For me that it is done in front of the camera for money and in front of audiences is a huge thing - then we will be comparing strippers to women who dance for the men in their lives - it isn't the same - it provokes a different feeling about sex and women in general. Normal, run of the mill people don't sleep with thousands of people - to me that is just nasty and doesn't turn me on. Even rec sex that is not out of love is private - why do people get so pissed off when someone tapes them or sells tapes without them knowing? - even when it is casual sex. Because we chose to share that part of us with someone else and not the world and these people do - their bodies to them are not special enough to share for the people whom they choose - but to the world for a decent paycheck.
2006-08-27 12:44:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's not exactly "just sex in front of a camera"...it's more the packaging of a sexual fantasy for (mass) consumption. No sex I've ever had looked that fake, on or off camera. And I don't think many other people "perform" like that when doin' it. As for the morality question, it's a non-issue for me.
2006-08-27 12:51:47 · answer #10 · answered by weasel_sponge 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋