English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do American sheeple really need this government manufactured boogie man to remain alive so they have fear to keep them occupied? After all the media links to his death, what will it take for sheeple to finally say he is dead? Does the chimp have to physically parade a body on your TV screen? C'mon people! Check out the links:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/washington/04intel.html?ei=5088&en=3779ed9b98bb9d22&ex=1309665600&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/UFNOsamatapefake.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/07/17/attack/main515468.shtml
http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/
http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/south/01/18/gen.musharraf.binladen/
http://www.swissinfo.org/eng/swissinfo.html?siteSect=105&sid=1485474
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/11/29/1038386299712.html

2006-08-27 12:16:26 · 16 answers · asked by mikeygonebad 2 in Politics & Government Government

16 answers

becuase the bush administration is keeping his dead body for an emergency during the elections

2006-08-27 12:20:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Uh why does FoxNews say directly what he died of back in Dec 2001 but CNNs speculations are not until '02?
Frankly my understanding of the situation is, dead or alive no one over there gives a rats behind about him. He's not top dog any more however the US as a whole has come to recognise the name. It's like you say Hitler you think Nazi, you say Bin Laden you think terrorist.
Personaly I think people would like to see a chimp parade his body, it would be entertaining and uniting. Of course then again we'd have to find another name that would be equated to terrorism and with terorrists actually being a rather large group that would be difficult.

2006-08-27 19:29:07 · answer #2 · answered by saepenon 2 · 0 0

Unfortunately, every one of those stories has been proven wrong by Osama showing up for an interview with news person. a few months after the latest 2002 story was published. Old news is no news

2006-08-27 19:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 1 0

Firstly, Fox News is not reputable. Fox has a political agenda, thus its reportage is skewed, biased.
Secondly, the reason so many people think bin Laden is still alive is because he keeps making videotapes from the great beyond.

2006-08-27 19:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by voltaire 3 · 0 0

I have no doubt that USB is still alive, the recent audio tapes referencing recent events demonstrate that. These tapes have been shown to be legitimate by the best voice analysts in the world.
Most likely he is in a house in a remote Pakistan area being protected by those that feel loyalty to him for leading the fight against the Russians in Afghanistan, and whose culture encourage them to protect those in their house. This is very typical in Arab cutures. Besides, it took years to find Terry Nichols in the Carolinas in OUR country, this job is hundreds of times more difficult.

2006-08-27 19:26:37 · answer #5 · answered by youdriveimbusy 1 · 0 0

They are same people who says, jesus is still alive, Elvis is still alive and so on and o forth. Alive or dead, the twin yowers are lost for ever, the war on terror is lost, Iraq is a lost cause. lets do some soul searching and ponder where we went wrong in all this mess.

2006-08-27 19:21:43 · answer #6 · answered by miamian 3 · 1 0

there has been no actual proof of his death and that poses a problem, yeah i would like to see a body before i beleve it.

i am not one of the sheeple you refer to and do agree that the governmental control over the 'media' is outrageous.

2006-08-27 19:36:25 · answer #7 · answered by SmoothFlo 3 · 0 0

Okay, that's a bunch of crap. I am not even going to your websites because I have faith in my government. Besides, the press releases are current when Osama Bin laden speaks about attacks that are recent.

2006-08-27 19:23:08 · answer #8 · answered by DispatchGirl 4 · 1 1

Lots of theories & guesses but no evidence...
Believe what you like...
P.T. Barnum said it best..
"There is a sucker born every minute"..
You don't think G.W. Bush would announce Bin Ladens
death if there was one shred of provable evidence ?

2006-08-27 19:26:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its so clear .. usa created that illusion called TERRORIST in order to control countries for it own advantages ... u all should know . that bin laden lived for a long time in usa ... Bush created him

2006-08-27 19:25:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers