i most definitely think so.
which has me more than a little afraid, actually.
especially since he's already made a mockery of some of our constitutional rights and some of the guidelines inherit in it. who's to say that he won't somehow create a loop-hole to get himself re-elected for a third term?
think about it.
if you were the candidate seeking office after him, knowing that this whole mess won't be sorted out then, would you want to go in and have to clean it up and try to make amends for all the chaos he's caused?
it's a fact most countries NOW hate the u.s. than BEFORE bush took office. countries that were once our allies (france and russia) are now reconsidering their relationships with us.
so, you being the candidate, would you want all that needless responsibility or...would you want bush to sort out his own problems?
i have a feeling most people would want him to do that.
plus, it goes along the lines of who's worse?
"the evil you know or the evil you don't know".
2006-08-27 12:20:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Republicans Cut and Ran from Vietnam. The Republicans Cut and Ran Lebenon. Who is the party of Cut and Run? The Democratic Party wants to Cut the loss of American soldiers lifes and stop the Running of our brave soldiers blood in the sand of Iraq!
2006-08-27 21:27:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ggarsk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The war on terror can't be won with military alone. Those people need an economy and hope. Democracy will allow that, the *** backeward system they had did not. We are there for everyones well being, long term , yours included.
2006-08-27 19:19:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
first of all we must know that bush have created a false reason to invade Iraq under the plea of weapons of mass destruction and when he reach there he didn't find any thing he is trying to convince the world that he is trying to put the basses of democracy in Iraq and this will never happen by tropes i can support my words by the following when the pm el gaafary tried to stand against the American policy in Iraq USA had kicked him out of the government ... briefly bush need to achieve something glories in Iraq to prove to the whole world that he had terminated all the evils in the middle east specially Saddam husiaan
2006-08-27 19:35:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am sure that the President Actually said "we are not leaving IRAQ as long as he is the President". I think he is keeps his word and he is doing the right thing even though most don't seem to understand it.
2006-08-27 19:18:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
His is the correct answer. We Republicans do not believe in Cut and Run that is only for you democrats. Now go read your talking points and try again.
2006-08-27 20:04:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's completely foolish and irrational. It just goes to show that he does not have this countries best interest at heart. He is profitting from this war and as long as he has the power to do so, he will continue.
2006-08-27 19:15:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
its only for 2 more years possibly till the new president works things out but this war is pointless cause you can't stop terrorism.
2006-08-27 19:17:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Matthew Shlmn 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No and its a fact that Bush hasn't killed anyone...
I think the question was completely idiotic and indicative of someone who wasted taxpayer money while at school...
2006-08-27 19:15:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by juandos 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. He's going to be president for only a short time longer. I suppose he suspects U.S. business will not be finished in Iraq in that short amount of time.
2006-08-27 19:13:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by ihaftaknow 3
·
1⤊
2⤋