2006-08-27 10:00:51 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No
2006-08-27 10:02:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah I do think that is a good idea ...a place where aliens can stop over while visiting earth. As for where it should be, I think all the nations should vote and choose the most suitable location. Or maybe it should be on a rotational basis.
NYC already seems to be the capital of the world though...
2006-08-27 10:09:15 · answer #2 · answered by david g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Furthermore, I believe the U.N. has devolved into a corrupt self serving agency. Mr. Annon is the worst Sec. Gen I have seen since I started paying attention to politics and world affairs back in 1982. If he has done anything to help the blighted third world nations of Africa and elsewhere,it certainly hasn't been trumpeted about by the liberal press. If you have any specific details, I would certainly like to know.
2006-08-27 10:15:38 · answer #3 · answered by S.A.M. Gunner 7212 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great Question, but alack the world can't agree on feeding itself yet. Like the President of the USA, when we do have a Capital of the World it should change every four years
2006-08-27 10:07:47 · answer #4 · answered by thecharleslloyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There sort of is a capital of the world...if you consider the United Nations headquarters in New York a capital of the world.
2006-08-27 10:03:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We would only need a capital of the world if we needed somewhere to have representatives on our behalf for the benifit of other planets. That is what we use our capital cities for on a smaller scale. Perhaps an idea for 3006AD, eh?
2006-08-27 10:12:49 · answer #6 · answered by hbakfam 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree especially if it is in the United States.You people haven't done anything right in the past 300 years except write the Bill of Rights which is completely irrelevant as it has been squashed by The Patriot Act.
2006-08-27 10:07:21 · answer #7 · answered by theforce51 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
man, what next, should we have a chancellor of the world, Bow before my might or I shall smite thee down, muwahahaha. It would probably be either, Bush, chertoff, putin or blair, or maybe annan the UN guy who doesnt help anyone anyway. Anyway its all lame. And NO, Not until we make contact officially with other life forms from distant galaxies at least.
2006-08-27 10:05:40 · answer #8 · answered by bill o 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because you need the world to agree on one place and that could never happen. And besides, we would only need a capitol of the world if there was life on other planets. Also, if we had a capitol of the world, then we'd also need somebody to be in charge, which would never happen.
2006-08-27 10:05:01 · answer #9 · answered by Davey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a good idea, a perfect place would be 'the Bermuda triangle,,we could send all the people who want to be leaders to the triangle on a boat and when they all disappear...world peace would begin
2006-08-27 10:20:40 · answer #10 · answered by fran 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont know if I agree that there should, but I just wanted to take issue with Leogirl0804- Americans speak ENGLISH, (all be it with regional and cultural variations, slang and different spellings!)
I love London, no other city comes close in my opinion.
2006-08-27 10:12:25 · answer #11 · answered by lmarriott 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋