English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

With all the unanswered questions, the suspicious nature of Bush's actions, the coincidences found leading up to the tragedy, the after the fact findings such as thermate in all 3 buildings, yet the other buildings were not destroyed, buildings build like fortresses by the way, designed to withstand at least 3 plane impacts and still stand. How can you say there was no conspiracy when physics, PHYSICS DICTATES that the towers could not fall in there own footprints, and wouldn't have fallen at all. How can you believe the mainstream when all the mainstream showed you were some distance cameras with little or no sound, what about the explosions, the bomb reports, the seismic data that only means it was an explosive placed on a grounded support. Or the fact Bushs cousin owned the security company, that the guards were put on standby for several weeks while "drills" were conducted where it was reported that they were there for 12 hours at a time-Doing what I ask? I have more-outta room

2006-08-27 09:41:34 · 15 answers · asked by bill o 1 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

I think that you read all of this "evidence" with a preconceived notion about the cause of the towers' falls, and are accepting it uncritically.

I do think that there is a chance that the American far right was responsible for the 9/11 events, but I don't see that there is any solid evidence for that. All of the things that you mention here could be read in different ways. For example, the buildings DID withstand the plane impacts. At that point they were structurally sound, and (according to the official story) it was only the later fire that brought them down.

I don't believe for a second that Bush was personally involved, though, as he's simply not bright enough for that. Would you trust him with a secret of that magnitude? Obviously not.

2006-08-27 10:46:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well between an education system that was designed to turn out workers not thinkers and the fact that all mainstream media on the planet is controlled by the Zionists and there is overwhelming evidence that Television has covertly been putting out subliminal messages dumbing down the public,is it any wonder that people don't see the real evidence.Hitler once said "The more outrageous the terrorist act committed by the government on it's people,the less likely the people will believe it was the government.Leogirl 0804 is an idiot.The top Structural Engineers in the world have all said the buildings could only fall at free fall by way of explosives,no if ands or buts.

2006-08-27 16:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by theforce51 3 · 4 1

I haven't been wearing my tin-foil hat so I'm probably under the influence of the mind controllers.

If you don't think a building could fall from the fire alone, I'm sorry its not a matter of popular opinion. You've demonstrated an ignorance of physics. Perhaps you've never heard of Euler's column buckling formula.

Pcr = pi^2 ( E) (I) / L^2

where Pcr is the column buckling load and L is the effective length of the column.

This formula is why the WTC collapsed. The concrete floors, each of them were supported by steel joist. The floors and joist acted as laterial support to the outer columns which supported the building. This reduced the effective length so the columns supported the building. The fire caused the steel joist to collapse and drop one floor onto the one below causing it to fall as well. An then the floor below that. This removed the laterial support and increased the effective length of the outer columns. Once enough floors had been lost the outer columns buckled, and the whole structure fell several floors straight down. The momentum of the building falling crushed the stucture below.

Down is easy. Gravity takes care of that.

If you want to wear a tin foil hat and wallow in ignorance go ahead but don't pretend physics or logic will support your case.

2006-08-27 18:58:37 · answer #3 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 1 0

It is very frustrating. It is so obvious that the "government" was involved. Check out www.pnac.info. The government was involved to the core. They've done this sort of thing before (they being conservative think-tankers).

I'm hoping somebody out there can muster the evidence and bring somebody in the administration to trial, even the President and his sidekick(s), and send them to prison. What a breath of fresh air that would be, and the world would watch in awe at the workings of Real Democracy.

Ruthless murderers conceal their tracks efficiently, but there are always flaws which may be exploited, like WHERE'S THE PLANE THAT "HIT" THE PENTAGON. WHERE'S THE DAMN PLANE!

2006-08-27 17:01:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 4 0

Physics dictates that these building were designed to fall straight down. Every building has a life span and the wtc was no different. When you build skyscrapers in as tight of space as NY you also have to design their end life too. And a real architect or designer will set you straight real quick on that one.
You need to provide some sources for your other goofy items (they certainly are NOT factual in any sense) , from where I sit you are just telling a made up story.

2006-08-27 16:54:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I've asked myself the same question ever since 9/12/01 (that first day I was too much in shock). But it's been crystalclear ever since that, no "they" don't hate us because of our "freedom" or because we let our women expose some skin, and "they" had nothing to do with the attack because it is our own government who had motive, opportunity and the means to carry out this horrendous attack which was created to pit Americans against "them", whoever they are on any given day. Terrorists?! Primarily in our White House.

2006-08-27 17:32:22 · answer #6 · answered by Helga J 3 · 2 0

Conspiracy therorists need to give up.

We the people don't have enough money to research for conspiracy, and the government has too much power to cover their tracks.

Either way, we will never know the whole truth.
Also, most of the evidence in the steel from the buildings were mysteriously and rapidly shipped away and cannot be found.

2006-08-27 16:51:17 · answer #7 · answered by Nep-Tunes 6 · 1 2

there aren't enough of us smart enough to see the evidence. They sheep won't believe it even if it is in plain sight.

A common bell curve of intelligence only has a 12 and half percent or less percent of the population smart enough and educated enough to see what really happened.

2006-08-27 16:56:34 · answer #8 · answered by ceprn 6 · 1 0

It really is obvious - the US government, sorry, Bush's administration was behin the 9/11 attacks. They kinda made it too obvious.

2006-08-27 16:47:55 · answer #9 · answered by Emad 2 · 4 0

Thats interesting, can you give a source for this information? I've always been very curious as to why they fell so quickly and why they fell in their own footprints.

2006-08-27 16:46:27 · answer #10 · answered by fleaciante 2 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers