of Playboy Enterprises...
Or should they both disappear !
2006-08-27 09:28:36 · 15 answers · asked by marnefirstinfantry 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
If you think Hefner would be a better president than Bush,you probably voted for Gore and Kerry,who fall into the same category as Hefner,liberal ilk! If Clinton hadn't been reading Playboy while Monica sucked his Popsicle,then the terrorists wouldn't have had 8 years to build their base,we could have had Bin Laden somewhere in a little box!
2006-09-01 02:44:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
first off, Hugh Hefner only had a brilliance of insight in post WWII US pseudo-Victorian culture, and in a very limited aspect of it. he'd be unlikely to succeed with that gimmick these days.
Secondly, Hefner has had a stroke, which disqualifies him in my mind.
Think how international politics fell apart after Woodrow Wilson had his stroke. In fact, the Middle East was divided up by the European imperial powers, putting France in charge of Syria and UK in charge of Palestine, setting the stage for the peace that ended all peace. Of note there is a great history book under exactly that title "The Peace that Ended all Peace." (to digress a moment, that book makes it clear that the imperial European post WWII division of power in the Middle East was the origin of the word "mandate," not the way GWB mis-used it after his most recent re-election.)
The big irony is that in post-WWI, the US congress refused to back Wilson's version of division of the Middle East, returning instead to international policies of isolation.
now we have GWB choosing the opposite approach with this (unsuccessful) war following on the (unsuccessful) political rhetoric of 'regime change'
my question to you is are those the only two options?
2006-09-04 11:45:00 · answer #2 · answered by knewknickname 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because then there would be a strip club abd xxx bookstore
right next to the kids playground. Crack head hookers
would be doing the 9 year old boys for thier lunch money..
2006-08-27 16:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by deltaxray7 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When Hugh parades his bevy of "quails" before Congress it should wake up the old fogies and maybe we will get some sensible action out of them.
It's worth a try, how do we go about getting it done?
2006-09-01 00:05:55 · answer #4 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
YES and NO to Bush. Dubya is a business dummy,but is good as an alcoholic.
2006-09-04 03:31:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, you should, you deserve to have fidel kastro as president. In that case you would not talk so much rubbish.
When I say you, I mean all people in this country
2006-08-27 16:32:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good grief, NO! That would wreck Playboy!
2006-09-03 09:12:35 · answer #7 · answered by Scott K 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither, they both support only the rich, the middle class and poor would suffer more.
2006-08-27 16:33:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think Hef has a good eye for his work so lets keep him there!
2006-08-27 16:34:51 · answer #9 · answered by lostintheclover 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just imagine....every body naked in Congress !
Awwwg !
2006-09-01 19:46:16 · answer #10 · answered by rc 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋