I don't agree with you. There is no reason that a kid needs to have a web cam. As for the myspace, it can go 50/50 - some kids are stupid and give info out and can fall prey to predators, and whether you believe it or not there are TONS of predators out there, and it's not hard to find out where someone lives. Parents are perfectly within their rights to monitor their kids on the computer and not allow them to have a webcam and if they feel strongly, even a myspace.
Kids don't realize it, but it's all in their best interest.
2006-08-27 09:05:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rawrrrr 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't see any reason why kids would need webcams in the first place. It seems to me the main reasons to have a webcam are sexual. I mean, what else do people do with them? It's fine if all parties are adults. Yes, sites like MySpace are very safe IF a person doesn't give out any personal information. But you have to remember that kids are gullible and child predators are very smart. The danger is that predators learn the current teenage/kid lingo, what's popular with them now, etc. so when your kid is chatting with them they think it's another kid. Parents really need to keep their kids educated about this and stay on top of these things. DON'T let your kids have webcams and keep computers in the family/living room where you can keep an eye on what they're chatting about. Most kids are way too naive and trusting.
2006-08-28 18:08:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think its fair that you blame Oprah alone on this. She just brought the issues of myspace and the webcam incident to the attention of all those over protective parents. It was then those parents who decided to allow or not allow their children to have those things because they either didn't trust them enough or didn't want to take any chances.
The following saying holds very true in this particular dillema and that is "Don't shoot the messenger!"
P.S What's the bet that every single person who disagreed with you were parents who either have a. no faith in the intelligence of their own children (they usually blame it on innocence) or b. Have technophobia and are afraid of inventions such as the webcam and thus don't want it around their kids.
2006-08-30 04:59:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rika F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I agree, it all comes down to parenting. However society is so big to point the finger at someone else instead. Almost like cutting off the head to cure a headache. Parents need to take more responsibility for their child's actions as well as lifestyle instead of letting society do the work for them.
You must remember that Oprah is big in the public eye so therefore she's very politically correct. AND probably does not have any children of her own.
2006-08-27 09:08:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by The 3rd Nipple 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm getting unwell and tire of females choosing losers to father their toddlers and then crying approximately what a deadbeat he's....they think of "Oh he's a cheating liar that beverages too plenty" "He won't carry a job" (or some thing alongside those strains besides) i understand I"ll have a sprint one with him, which will make him strengthen up....Oy yoy yoy..maybe he could desire to keep his dick in his pants, yet he does no longer have everywhere to place it if some thing wasn't unfold open first... (i'm additionally in a sort of moods in the present day....) i understand everyones circumstances are diverse. some adult males do no longer practice their real hues till after the toddler is right here...., yet maximum in many situations supply some hint it relatively is surpassed over finally that's the youngsters who are suffering. it relatively is the troublesome area. I finished heartily agree and that i'm a woman. The device is all approximately what the female needs. Too many females think of latest child help could desire to pay for each little thing their newborn desires, needs, and then some. they do no longer sense they could desire to could desire to make contributions a single penny in view that they have the "burden" of raising the youngsters. i understand multiple adult males that should compliment to be the single raising their newborn(ren) that does no longer even elect help from the mothers (in maximum jurisdictions fathers nonetheless combat a dropping conflict for custody. the mummy could could desire to be an awl murderer to no longer get custody). no longer all mothers are that undesirable, yet plenty see their toddlers as a paycheck or a skill to punish their ex's for shifting on with their lives... In in the present day's financial device quite, there desires to be some supply. a good number of folk are dropping their jobs. If that happens they are appeared at as deadbeats? I comprehend he/she desires to come across yet another job, yet as quickly as I even have custody and lose my job I even have aspects to help me till i will get decrease back on my ft. The non custodial ascertain does not have that luxurious. They the two pay or lose their drivers license or bypass to detention center. the place is the fairness there?
2016-12-11 16:17:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by miracle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Parents have reasons that they do those things, if they didn't you'd see just how ugly the real world is. In the real world , if you don't have $$$ NOBODY is going to give it to you . People WILL use you for anything you have , you DON'T even have to be rich. They will use your body, your car, your money, your time, your ideas. They DON'T care about YOU. The ONLY people in this world who will ever give a rat's *** about YOU , is your parents. Respect them , be grateful you have them, DON'T take them for granted.
2006-08-27 09:14:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by primamaria04 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oprah is trying to save some lives here.
If you are inconvenienced by that, then you have a problem.
2006-08-27 09:08:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by Puzzler 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No..............I do not agree with you...........but their are things I don't agree with Oprah about....................but this is not one of them
2006-08-27 09:05:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by ginny3282 4
·
0⤊
0⤋