Pakistan team returned to the field at the request of the ICC Match Referee, but the game did not proceed because the umpire chose to stick to the law. Now the ICC is charging Inzy for the game abandonment as Hair chose to stick to his decision which the ICC referees was happy to bend. Should not Mike Procter be also charged for insisting that the game goes on despite the fact that the umpires had closed it?
2006-08-27
08:12:12
·
7 answers
·
asked by
mahmood
1
in
Sports
➔ Cricket