English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pakistan team returned to the field at the request of the ICC Match Referee, but the game did not proceed because the umpire chose to stick to the law. Now the ICC is charging Inzy for the game abandonment as Hair chose to stick to his decision which the ICC referees was happy to bend. Should not Mike Procter be also charged for insisting that the game goes on despite the fact that the umpires had closed it?

2006-08-27 08:12:12 · 7 answers · asked by mahmood 1 in Sports Cricket

7 answers

NO.

2006-08-27 19:18:37 · answer #1 · answered by A.R.RAJA 6 · 2 1

From what i read, the Match Ref (Procter) was in talks with England's bosses and the Pakistan team but no-one thought to tell the umpires what was being discussed.

The umpires were in a situation which was going to end in somebody being upset at it, for all we know, Procter wasn't told that the bails had been removed.

He shouldn't be charged. He is a victim of the whole situation

2006-08-29 04:27:40 · answer #2 · answered by Schorpe 2 · 0 0

Mike Proctor, was correct, in insisting.. He should have been more forceful. He should have convinced, the field umpires, to reverse their decision, in the interest of the game. He did not do so, this casts aspersions, on him also.

2006-08-28 05:38:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Once the umpire removes the bail's to call an end to the game, that is the end of the game!

2006-08-27 08:22:24 · answer #4 · answered by Phil H 4 · 1 0

To be honest lots of the 'migrants' interior the britain team do even have roots in England. Take previous as an occasion, his dad moved to South Africa for artwork and married a South African chick. that they had somewhat one and then moved lower back to England and persons declare that he's South African. lots of the 'migrants' have comparable thoughts and you will tell from their surnames that they are English. There are some glaring exceptions however including Pietersen, Kieswetter, Dernbach and Morgan, you ought to not get greater Afrikaans or Irish surnames. you may blame the Kolpak ruling for those adult adult males attending to play for England. by making use of eu regulation we ought to permit adult adult males from the ecu and associate international places of the ecu artwork and settle interior the united kingdom. they tremendously lots have each and every of the rights of British voters in those circumstances and thanks to that many sportsmen pass to Britain and observe for citizenship which makes them eligible for national decision. EDIT: actually I made a mistake approximately Dernbach, he moved to England along with his relatives while he substitute right into a baby and learnt all his cricket in England. "i don't owe something to South Africa. i substitute into in simple terms born there, did somewhat bit education there, my total cricket profession has been based interior the united kingdom, and uk is my domicile. i desire to offer each and every thing i will to England cricket, this is the rustic i admire and that's the rustic that has given me each and every thing I even have now." substitute into in simple terms analyzing approximately him on Wikipedia and theory I ought to positioned up a correction.

2016-12-14 13:02:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, youre right, the match referee could have intervened but he had his tongue uo Hairs arshole.

2006-08-27 09:26:59 · answer #6 · answered by vaivagabundo 5 · 0 2

No.

2006-08-28 02:21:10 · answer #7 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers