Hypothetically speaking, what would the democrats do if they found wmds in Iraq?

Answer 1

Oh yeah...we are way out there in hypothetical land now. I think most of my democrats in Congress would be glad...since they never had the spines to vote against Bush's war. Not finding WMD's hurt all the schmoes in Washington.

For me personally, I would love for WMD's to be found, because then I could finally believe that we invaded Iraq for some purpose.....

Answer 2

Try like mad to come up with something else to talk about. They DID find WMD in Iraq. They also found the means of production. The lefty media played it down, found other things to talk about. Go read the different reports from the UN teams. They did find WMD in Iraq and what they didn't find was either well hidden and is still there waiting to be found or was flown to Syria. Remember how Saddam's Air Force flew to Iran during the first gulf war (and remember Iran was Iraq's arch-rival!!!!). It's true, one of Saddam's generals revealed it in a recent book - the bulk of the WMD went to Syria. They also came up with the theory that any WMD found in Iraq would have been planted by the Bush administration, but only someone who's terminally ignorant would buy into that theory. You have to remember, Iraq is a big place and they have found things like whole squadrons of planes Saddam buried so they wouldn't be found or destroyed by bombing. At this point only the people who had their head in the sand (i.e. deliberately out of touch with reality) or who don't have good sources (I suppose you are in this category since you posed this question) know that they DID find WMD in Iraq. Despite the myths this war was about a lot more than WMD. The left is very good on taking things out of context and then building up false arguments based on their original false contentions. Go back and read ALL the reasons Bush said going into Iraq was necessary, then you might understand. And to those who say WHO CARES IF IRAQ OR IRAN GETS NUKES that's a piss-poor attitude because eventually when one of those idiot-run countries gets nukes they will use them and the world will be the worse for it. Firing off a nuke puts radioactive material into the atmosphere and the effects can be global.

Answer 3

Don't forget that the Dems voted with the Republicans to go to war based on the fact that Congress was TOLD that there were WMDs there. The Democrats OVERWHELMINGLY supported Bush's call to war.

You tell me, if Clinton had gone to war based on faulty and fabricated intelligence would the Republicans sit back with their thumbs up their azzes saying, "Oh well, it's okay, because what if there really had been WMDs?" Bullcrap. You and I both know they'd jump on that like they would a 2 dollar whore giving BJ's for free.

So now you want to just GLOSS OVER the fact that there AREN'T ANY WMDS and pose hypothetically, "What if there were?"

NO. Let's go back to "How come THERE ARE NO WMDS WHEN THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION SAID UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT THERE WERE WMDS?" And do you REALLY think that Rumsfeld and the boys have stopped looking???? They are turning over every grain of sand and desert rock trying to find something to show those WMDs were there all along even though the intellingence was bad, exaggerated and in some cases fabricated to make the case for war. If Rumsfeld and Cheney could they'd go squat over a sand dune and sh*t out a warhead just so there be a WMD on Iraqi soil.

So, it's STUPID to say, "What if there were WMDs?" when they were SUPPOSED TO BE THERE ALL ALONG!!!!!!!!

The better question is, "WHY was George Tenet pressured into providing faulty intelligence?"

Answer 4

hypothetically speaking, if the police found the remnants of a meth lab in a building but found no actual drugs there would the occupants of said building still be busted? i think so. now with that said wouldn't you think that finding the factory in which the WMDs were manufactured is the same as finding the WMDs? i think those idiots who keep saying there were no WMDs need to find out what was in all those trucks going into iran, syria, saudi arabia, and the other surrounding areas in the middle-east that we aren't allowed to go into then try to say there weren't any WMDs because the fact still remains that if you make the stuff but aren't caught with the stuff you're still guilty of using the stuff
my name's jim and i just don't know anymore

Answer 5

They did find WMD in Iraq. But you wouldn't know it because the dems continuously lie about it.

But, let's say they found SERIOUS WMD in Iraq. Put the euphemism aside. We are talking about nuclear warheads here. The dems would claim that the US government planted them there to justify war in the middle east.

This is quite a big deal as there is alot of evidence that suggests that Iran has an extensive nuclear weapons program. The bombs are all built, they just need to be supplied with fuel, which they are out in the open, refining right now.

Answer 6

Ok I will play along...

Say we found them today and it was announced publicly...

My response would be this:
I would find WMDs anywhere if I had occupied that area for 3 years also... meaning, there is no way I would ever believe they were there all this time. Come on... even Bush has admitted there were no WMDs.

Answer 7

Check for Dumbya's DNA and fingerprints on them?? Hypothetically what would Dumbyabots like you do if you met a human like being from Venus?..it being someplace with a temp that would melt lead and crushing pressures that a spacecraft can't stand. Both hypothesis are equally likely at this point.

Answer 8

Even if Iraq had nukes, so what? WE have enough nukes to destroy every human on the planet several times over. Does hypocrisy not bother you?

The rational for war was (supposedly) that it was a preemptive act of self defense. The underlieing assumption being that if Iraq had nukes, they would use them on us. That's a hell of an assumption. Is it ok for me to shoot my neighbor if I can prove he owns a gun? Can I assume that if he owns a gun that he plans to kill me? I think the burden is on George Bush to prove that Iraq had plans to attack us --with or without nuclear weapons. If he cant do that (and we all know he cant) then his war is not an act of national "self defense", and the blood of the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi men, women, and children is on his hands.

Answer 9

1. Claim that GWB put them there.

2. Hide them.

3. Claim that Israel had a secret weapons lab in Iraq.

4. Make flower pots out of them.

Answer 10

They know where those WMD's are located..and why.. It just doesn't fit into their agenda. That of destroying Bush