English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All I've heard from liberals this week is them talking about the anniversary of some small thing called Hurricane Katrina instead of facing the real issue that the killer of Jonbenet Ramsey is clearly an effeminate whackjob.
They talk about how FEMA's Broderick wouldn't send help until he could absolutely confirm that people were dying, and Matthew Broderick wouldn't do anything because he had to wait for his twice daily report, which would happen the day after Katrina struck. So he went home and went to sleep in his warm bed while Katrina struck. And that FEMA was so screwed up that Broderick didn't even know there was something wrong until he happened to pass by a TV with CNN coverage of hurrican Katrina that showed homes being washed away and families stuck on rooftops.
Why won't liberals face facts and see that clearly one little white girl's story is more important than the fact that the Bush admin screwed things up again during Katrina?
Jonbenet Ramsey....we will never forget.

2006-08-27 07:53:36 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Look, you bleeding heart liberals, like Barbara Bush, the mother of our beloved dictator said..."And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this is working very well for them."

They are BETTER OFF now, thanks to the inability of our government to utilize trailer homes for the evacuees TO THIS DAY.

Chew on that, liberal traitors. Jonbenet Ramsey is rolling in her grave.

2006-08-27 08:06:49 · update #1

I don't know why liberals are concerned that FEMA won't allow interviews with people in the trailer parks they have set up for the evacuees.

Who cares what they have to say, especially when we are free to interview the killer of God's littlelest angel, Jonbenet Ramsey.

I'd like to think when Natalee Holloway died, the angel of Jonbenet Ramsey descended and led her straight to heaven. Do not pass go, do not collect 200 dollars.

2006-08-27 08:11:39 · update #2

peaceandlove, I have no clue what you are talking about...everyone knows the story about the beating death of Martin Lee Anderson and he isn't a white blonde headed girl.

2006-08-27 08:16:40 · update #3

18 answers

I sit here chuckling at the amount of people who do not recognize this as a satirical question.

2006-08-27 07:59:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

With Ernesto headed that way I would say that the examination of the Katrina situation is certainly more important at this time than is Karr or JonBenet Ramsey. While I hope that her killer is apprehended and punished, I think that with the loss of life from Katrina at nearly 2000, and the definite possibility of a recurrence of that event it is by far the most important topic. If you had the ability to be totally honest with yourself, instead of being so emotionally involved, you would see the logic in my statements.
While I would be the first to admit that Karr is a bit of a fruit-loop, a fop, definitely effeminate, and probably confused, I am completely unconvinced that he was JonBenets' killer. There is just too much in his story that doesn't fit the facts as they are known to us today.
Having said that, I am neither Republican nor Democrat, and most likely will never be considered either.
Some of the terms I used for Karr, have also been used to describe Mr Bush. The argument aside that he has sent persons to their deaths, being a fruit-loop, fop, effeminate or confused certainly doesn't make him a killer of little girls.
Should Karr turn out to be such, it still doesn't reduce the fact that you are attempting to compare a family situation, and a single death, with one of our nations worst natural disasters and the deaths of nearly 2000. Many of which were innocent and helpless children.

2006-08-27 08:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by h2odog 3 · 0 0

Firstly, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, i.e Katrina was of more cultural and political significance than the murder of one little girl a decade ago. Secondly, don't be so sure you have her killer, there's a good chance this man is just a sick fantasist, the dna isn't back yet and his ex wife swears he was with her at the time of the murder. Why don't you be honest and own up to your real problem - that you're a racist?

2006-08-27 08:02:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

HUH? Let's see. Something that has affected, through death, destruction and the permanet changing of so many lives and continues to affect MILLIONS of people should be diminished in favor of the death of one little girl? I would think not.

I am also disturbed by the fact thay YOU havve already conviced this guy. One of the tenants that this country was founded on is the concept of (even though it no longer exists) "innocence until proven guilty". How about letting the system run it's course before you pass such quick judgement.

2006-08-27 08:07:09 · answer #4 · answered by Michael 3 · 0 0

I can only assume you are being sarcastic and totally believe you are. Our media will spend more time on a ten year old unsolved murder of a little girl from a white rich family. Meanwhile hundreds of children from poor black families died and there has been no accountability for the powers to be and people are still dying b/c of misappropriation of funds etc.
Our media system sucks. As consumers we buy into it and are not nearly critical enough of this very very powerful force.

2006-08-27 08:10:00 · answer #5 · answered by peaceandlove™ 4 · 2 0

I'm sure the Democrats don't hate JonBenet and I'm sure they like everyone else is glad her killer has been apprehended. But we heard and heard and heard about JoBenet a decade ago. This thing was hashed and rehashed possibly more than O.J. Simpson or Nancy Kerrigan/Tonya Harding.

2006-08-27 08:14:32 · answer #6 · answered by Leif Ericson 1 · 0 0

So uh, what's more important? A president who's killed thousands in Iraq, (through inaction) killed roughly 1.5 thousand in Louisiana, and tortures ad nasuem or a girl that died ten years ago?

Typical, you focus on an event that happened ten years ago, and complain that other people aren't, but are trying to stop many worse things now.

-In Memory of JonbenetRamsey

2006-08-27 09:31:59 · answer #7 · answered by John S 4 · 1 0

Well, Ramsey was just one kid. Katrina killed thousands. That doesn't mean we shouldn't care, but this was just one high-profile murder out of thousands every year. Where I live there are several murders a year in this small town, some of them every bit as horrific as hers, if not moreso. She just happened to make the press.

2006-08-27 08:19:35 · answer #8 · answered by Nathan 3 · 0 0

Uhh, that may be a good argument, but he may not be the guy ..And ALL of the news channels have shown a great deal of time this week to the Jon Benet story.

Im down with blasting Liberals, but cmon dude, lol..

2006-08-27 08:00:03 · answer #9 · answered by itsallover 5 · 0 1

If we don't pay more attention to the death of one rich white girl than to the so called suffering of tens of thousands of ******, then the terrorists have already won.

2006-08-27 08:00:34 · answer #10 · answered by the master of truth 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers