why spontaneous generation is not possible?

Answer 1

Spontaneous generation of life is defined as "life springing up out of NOWHERE from NOTHING, spontaneously, like some "magical appearance." Spontaneous generation is what people actually thought and believed in in prior centuries, prior to the science world explaining the biological phenomena we study today, especially since the invention of the microscope and our ability to see life on a microscopic level. When maggots appeared in putrifying flesh, people did not understand that flies had laid tiny eggs and the eggs had gone thru metamorphosis into a larva called the maggot. The basic cell theory from a couple centuries ago states that "life begets life," that "all life-cells come from pre-existing cells-life." (Schleiden and Schwann). The microscopic discoveries thus helped us find the "invisible" phases between no-maggot and maggot.

Also, those who are around "death" a lot can understand that when "soul-spark" leaves the body-cell, then there is biological death of that vehicle.

Thus, this contemporary science theory does not really disagree with the ancient Vedic sciences, however, but most modern scientists do differ in their definition of "life." Life by Vedic scripture is defined as "eternal spirit or soul spark". The difference in the definitions is that the Vedas teach that the "eternal soul spark" enlivens the temporary vehicle it travels in, regardless of whether the vehicle is uni-cellular bacterial cell or a complex multi-cellular organism like a human.

Anything made of matter had a-The Creator! The Vedic sciences explain the science of creation, spirit, birth, death and God

Answer 2

I think it takes more faith to believe in the big bang theory that it does in God Said. To think all this happen by accident is way out there in stupidity or the fact someone just doesn't want to recognize there is a God and they ain't it. The Word day in the Bible can also be translated new birth for those who dough that God could create whatever He wanted when He wanted. The fact that one animal can't live with less or more DNA seems to go over the Teachers Union heads but to recognize that would mean there is A God. The Bible has never been proven wrong. There is a difference between crossbreeding and evolution which seem to confuse some people, the books in schools have been proven misleading and nonfactual yet the courts let them stay because otherwise God would have to be the answer. Adam and Eve called God a lair and so have all the rest of the generations. We are to worship the Creator not the creation.

Answer 3

In the beginning days of Earth, abiotic chemicals combined to form the first self-replicating molecules, which could be considered spontaneous generation. However, usually the term "spontaneous generation" implies something much more complicated being generated, like maggots (?) in the famous experiment that disproved it. Even bacteria, the simplest form of known life (unless you count viruses) are far too complicated to appear all at once.

Answer 4

I think you have to go a little further and look at the formative reasons why things come into being. It isn't quite so complicated as something appearing out of nowhere like a brand new species from scratch and with purple hair. It doesn't work that way at all. There has to be some sort of sequential activity which leads to a more complex activity, and a successful continuation which perpetuates said activity. Even in the wildest physical models I have ever heard of there was at least a causative line of reasoning which leads to other things.

Answer 5

Essentially it is because there must be some form of external stimuli to begin the process of cellular growth and development. Even with the Big Bang there are components and elements that would have provided for cellular growth and development just because of the adverse interactions of the elements and wavelengths in the vacuum of space. The truth of the matter is now that nothing will occur on a cellular level unless some other organism prompts the growth of it. Without the presence of something be it bacteria, an insect, sperm, or anything else nothing else will be cultured or capable of growing...

Answer 6

"Spontaneous" is misrepresented here. "Spontaneity" is a physics concept, more or less meaning: when the conditions are right for chance to replicate intent, as in "Spontaneous Combustion". I am aware of no reason it should be considered impossible, and is even necessary to explain the first living organism, unless there was always life (now THERE is an example of impossible!).

Answer 7

Well you have to look at what is necessary for life

the most important thing is that life comes from life
the DNA has to be used, its made of proteins, made of amino acids, made of 4 nucleotides, made of Carbon, Oxygen, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen

NOw tell if it is likely that billionsxbillions of atoms can spontaneously come together to make enough nucleotides to make enough amino acid chains to make Usable DNA?

then if that were to happen, how is that DNA going to replicate itself without more stuff that happens spontaneously?

Answer 8

WHat do you mean by spontaneus generation?