Is there a third choice here?
2006-08-28 01:15:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kanda 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Food
2006-08-27 09:03:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Food is one of our physiological needs on the Maslow's hierarchy of human needs. A human's physiological needs take highest priority. When the physiological needs are met, the need for safety will emerge. After the physiological and safety needs are fulfilled, the third human need is social. Are you trying to decide between a sandwich and a shag?
2006-08-27 09:18:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by daca_moracca 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex is better but food is more important....of course if nobody had sex, the human race would die out, if nobody ate...same outcome. Now, if everyone had sex and ate as much as they wanted we would have an abundance of fat babies overpopulating the earth. But of course sex is one of the best cardio exercises for loosing weight....so maybe not.
2006-08-27 09:05:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sex > Food (for better)
Food > Sex (for important)
I'm always hungry after sex.
2006-08-27 09:20:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by VIC VIC 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Food.
2006-08-27 09:05:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by brogdenuk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Food.
2006-08-27 09:02:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Xan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex is better but food is more important. Together...well now that's something to think about!!
2006-08-27 10:36:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Comparing food and sex is like comparing chalk and cheese. Both are essential parts of life but not comparable
2006-08-27 17:44:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends who the sex is with.
If it's with you, Saudi Geoff, I'd rather eat a decomposed chicken.
2006-08-27 09:18:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Hello Dave 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Food first, then sex as you need food to keep you going
2006-08-27 09:01:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋