2006-08-27 01:41:11 · 14 answers · asked by iknowtruthismine 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, they should be called mercenaries, since they're getting paid to defend a cause that is not theirs. Journalism is an intellectual exercise, calling for a degree of honesty and integrity
2006-08-27 01:48:15 · answer #1 · answered by Chevalier 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No a journalist is a representative of Hollywood lefty bent wrist liberalism. The FOX news show is closer to the truth though because they beat the same story to death non stop many times, I find myself watching Jeff Beck. As for the rest of CNN----puke!
2006-08-27 08:57:32 · answer #2 · answered by tripledigit 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they are not journalists, they're Bush Administration spokespersons. Fox News and the White House should just merge,
2006-08-27 08:52:26 · answer #3 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course - get a clue - they are the #1 rated cable news channel - that's why they beat both CNN and MSN continually over the past 2 years.
2006-08-27 08:48:50 · answer #4 · answered by Caroline H 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They should all be asked to walk out just like Dan Rather, and for the the same reason all the others too.
2006-08-27 12:20:20 · answer #5 · answered by FILO 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes they are the best in the business better than your sources, and they present both sides unlike your sources...
2006-08-27 10:07:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure they are no more or less "journalists" than any other MSM pundits.
2006-08-27 08:45:41 · answer #7 · answered by Brian B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
seems to me the truth hurts the lying left
2006-08-27 09:50:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, if they fulfill the requirements of ethical journalism, then yes. Otherwise, no.
2006-08-27 08:57:41 · answer #9 · answered by dane 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think it's performance art.
2006-08-27 10:08:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋