the world divided into various countries gradually over the last 5000 years. some countries that exist today emerged hundreds of years ago like france and england, but most of the countries that exist today became independent only in the 19th or 20th centuries, that means in the last 200 years.
2006-08-26 23:41:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ked Becker 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Among the many trite aphorisms meant to sound profound and erudite in Henry David Thoreau's Walden is one passage that records a war between the red ants and the black ants, two hostile groups that were of different colors and sizes. I mention this because I imagine that, like ants, human beings clustered into little clans and tribes from zenophobia, a fear of anything that was different. I imagine that this response was a means of protecting themselves against anything that seemed unusual and unfamiliar. Racism, as bad as we see it now, surely has a natural inception. As trade became imperative groups became larger taking in more people who were different but somewhat similar (thus cities and city states emerged) and then the extensions of groups became larger yet and countries were established. Will we at one time witness a global community where there are no countries? That is the next question that you may pose
2006-08-27 04:01:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Steven S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's how I see it.
We started out as individuals, then started to work together in tribes, then mixing between tribes. We evolved and mixed in bigger and bigger packs, communicating. It would seem that nothing would stop us from becoming one big world wide nation eventually.
Then came competition, early stages of nationalism and conquest. Tribes wanted to be better than the next, and chose to stay separated instead of joinning.
Finally, within big tribes, smaller cliks started to form and decided that they were better than the rest and didn't want to be slowed down by the others, so they seeked independence.
It's a very simplistic view of the world but I think it answers your question, if not, too bad, I enjoyed answering this :) It served me :P
2006-08-26 23:54:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by gBobly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Forming groups is a natural human instinct. A nation is nothing more than a group. And things go in cycles. When the world becomes one nation, there will be fighting and factions and the whole clan/tribe/city/nation thing will start over again. It's natural.
2006-08-28 20:57:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by debate_gate 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the concept of modern nation-states has taken root mostly after the first world war. even though nationalism have always had a tendency of becoming fascism, but still we believe in these artificial boundaries. an international government with a measure of local autonomy will be a much better alternate.
2006-08-27 00:38:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rustic 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
After the Babylon tower people started to speak different languages. But unfortunately even people who speak the same language like us and UK, Canada or the Arab countries or the USSR were separated due to the difference in economic desires and wealth of each region.
2006-08-26 23:40:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no longer a bad concept. yet i does no longer say the "test" isn't working. Its basically in the near previous began to no longer artwork considering extra further and extra skill gets interior the palms of the correct government. i think of a extra effective concept may well be to return the skill to the states! Which in result may well be just about like having 50 smaller international locations
2016-11-05 21:06:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by harib 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think its because sea level rose. Well that's what they said on some documentary =\...
2006-08-26 23:36:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by silvs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
the story of the tower of babble, in genesis, explains it.
2006-08-26 23:37:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
when different countris had different type of sexing method
2006-08-26 23:37:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋