2006-08-26 22:00:04 · 17 answers · asked by mahakjn jain 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
wwe is the best .
2006-08-26 22:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
After reading some of the responses you have received, all I have to say is WWE is still more popular, but is it really worth watching? I watch sometimes 2 or 3 minutes at a time once in a while on Monday night when I remember. It's that exciting. The last PPV I watched was Wrestlmania at Staples Center in Los Angeles. What a steaming pile that was! I was sorry for my uncle who purchased it. As for the "stars" in wwe who are they? There's no Stone cold, no rock. they keep calling hogan back cuz he gets ratings from his other show. Edge sux, Cena well he'll be gone soon after he starts making lame movies like the rock. Cactus jack, err, mick foley retires and unretires toomuch. The "divas" well, they are attractive, but too many and take up to much time. If they want the air time so bad, that need to step up and make their lame matches "hard core" where some of them may get juiced.Too many tired story lines. TNA. Well, it's ok. But I can never remember when that show is on but I usually watch more than the 2 or 3 minutes that I do of WWE, and they have 3 lame shows during the week. Recycled WWE - WCW wrestlers in TNA, yeah, but some of the " new breeds " are more interesting than the some of the "talent" in wwe. For instance, that samoa joe guy in tna, more entertaining than that guy who eats worms and acts like George "the animal" Steele. And samoa joe fights anybody. Also let me state, he is not my favorite wrestler. My All-Time favorite is that drunk goofball Scott Hall. So who knows. I see people responding wwe is great, at what? Wearing out my the buttons on my remote control? When will wrestling be fun again? The world may never know.
2006-08-26 22:40:58 · answer #2 · answered by hoopadudley 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WWE
It's more popular, been around longer, better plots, better divas, cooler wrestlers, more fan support, Support fans, 3 shows. WWE also has more legends and a bunch of contests.
TNA is a modified WCW...but they got all of WWE's wrestlers who quit or contracts expired...which sucks. But I find TNA to be boring, there hasn't been one time where I have seen the entire thing all the way through. About half way through I switch to Adult Swim.
Also, TNA has way too many things going on to last one hour. They need to make it 2 hours since they have aobut 6-7 titles. Also, women don't perform as much as they do in the WWE.
2006-08-26 22:17:57 · answer #3 · answered by soldierpoet6840 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
WWE is better, but TNA does more with less. If they had the same resources as the WWE then they'd be better. The WWE is great, I love them, but they aren't really creative right now. They should merge the Raw and Smackdown rosters again, becasue they are too thin on there own.
2006-08-27 03:25:05 · answer #4 · answered by Hypocrite Hunter 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe is alright if wwe invades tna it would be a mistake, tna superstars have more speed, more heart, more action then wwe. and wwe is the big leagues. if wwe would do it i would hate the wwe because what else could us wrestling fans should watch if wwe gets any more lamer and more boring then it is right now?!
2006-08-27 03:21:53 · answer #5 · answered by mamas_grandmasboy06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA would kick WWE's ***. TNA has actual wrestlers, AJ Styles, Chris Sabin. Half of these WWE fags are too scared to admit WWE is very bad and will DIE one day.
2006-08-27 04:10:46 · answer #6 · answered by MikeAwesome 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe hands down
but tna will win if in the tna ring
the wwe superstars wont be used to it
2006-08-26 22:18:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
wwe
2006-08-28 10:16:47 · answer #8 · answered by chris m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe
2006-08-27 02:06:07 · answer #9 · answered by trish 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WWE would win hands down.
2006-08-27 01:30:32 · answer #10 · answered by Ben N 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋