I Darrel Hair a Match Fixer??????

Question

As events are unfolding and probing is continued...Darrel Hair's seems to be in deep trouble.

Answer 1

ICC must probe this matter. Because, if you go back in time and see the replay of Day 4 of the Oval Test, you will see many clues. Darrel Hair was trying his best to ensure that Paksitan doesn't win. Even if you see the replay when Hair called the English batsmen to come to the ground as a formality before calling the match off, Hair was in great hurry. Just see that in real time and watch the clock, it hardly took a minute when he put the bails off. If you need other evidences, I can also provide more. Hair is definitely a Match Fixer.

Answer 2

Inzy have been given cleared because of the fact ICC is a coward physique, very afraid to stand the hue and cry. The 4 experience ban develop into for "taking the sport to disrepute" by forfeiting the experience, as though in any different case they have been a clean lot. that's a physique packed with hypocrites. So Hair had to be a scape-goat. no longer that it concerns. he's no longer a push over. he's an intensive professional and is conscious that he's right. If he's asked to quit for incorrect motives, ICC has to cough up the fee asked by him. So he keeps to be, no longer for the champions trophy however. Its a political sport toddler---not greater gents are in contact!

Answer 3

Yes he is in deep trouble Ali* thats why he's running away....the problem with cricket is that there is no 1 to umpire the umpires.....no doubt its a great sport and everything but still....umpires think (especially Hair) that they are always right....

paki team's fans are angry with him and degrading him in every way and this is a new way of looking at it. I mean he has lived in England for three years....i believe that he isn't a match fixer but was being partial.....

Answer 4

Match fixing?!? What the? What evidence do you have to suggest that?
He made a very bold decision during the game, which was in accordance with the letter of the law. Despite what is being said in much of the media, he didn't even accuse the Pakistan team of cheating, he merely changed the ball, because he was suspiscious it may have been tampered with, he is legally entitled to offer a new ball to the batsmen. It was Pietersen who accepted the new ball. The Pakistan team took offense to this, as they interpreted it as an accusation.
The latest furore is because he offered to resign to resolve the clamour around what happened, and he fixed his own value of retrenchement award, rather than the ICC offering it to him. To be honest, in court, lost earnings, personal suffering, loss of reputation etc, he would probably be awarded much more than $A500,000, so he was being fair to the ICC and cricket as well.

Answer 5

Who knows what reasoning people use to do things?
Was Hair a match fixer or was he just in his decision?
Was pakistan cheating or are they just crying cause they got caught?
Who knows?

Answer 6

pakistan player are not the purest souls.The've taken many bribes for a long time.They are cheats.
Now they focus us to racism.They are thinking to divert the issue.

but, heavy penalty awaits for inzamam.
apart from 1 or 2 incidents, Hair's track record is pretty much clean.

Answer 7

he is racist, unjust,selfish, greedy n never deserving to be an umpire, he also damaged the image of Austrelia, which is Number 1 in cricket this time, he even doesnt deserve to be an Australian :S.wht the hell he thinks that this world is blind n cant judge anthing, well yes he is in toruble n now he ,ll ahve to face that all

Answer 8

Firstly he is a racist and then a match fixer.

Answer 9

is he Pakistani ? no so he is not a match fixer