English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-26 19:56:33 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Music

if he were innocent and had vitiligo ..... he would be the most misunderstood man on the planet and the most attacked and if he didnt do it then he most certainly did alot of good im not sure if hes innocent or guilty but if hes innocent can u imagine wat pain he must be in ......

2006-08-26 20:05:55 · update #1

18 answers

Michael Jackson case is still really controversial and very debatable but I honestly think that Michael was innocent.

I mean some of the parents that sued Michael aren't trustworthy, either. Those people had gotten caught for stealing merchandise in department stores, from what I know.

But still, I wouldn't let my kids sleep with Michael...
Hahahahahaha

2006-08-26 20:05:19 · answer #1 · answered by heythere 3 · 0 0

He is innocent! He does have Vitiligo, you can see it in some pictures!

Big B823: The reason he left the country is because people like you wouldn't leave him alone! What is the big deal about giving his kid a nickname? Most parents have some silly nickname for their kids (we called my youngest Chunky Monkey)!! You need to grow up!!

♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥

2006-08-27 10:27:44 · answer #2 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0 0

If he's innocent he wouldn't have fled the USA to live in another country.

What would you think of a 40 something man who's nickname for his kid is "blanket". And that it is a "beautiful thing" to sleep in the same bed with little boys...that aren't his.

He shows up late for court...in pajamas. After leaving the courtroom he jumps on top of a vehicle and dances. He has had a multitude of elective cosmetic operations on his body dramatically altering his appearance.

Those who think he's innocent are as dillusional as he is.

Guilty!!

2006-08-27 03:13:17 · answer #3 · answered by viewAskew 5 · 0 1

Given that he hasn't actually been convicted of anything, the law already presumes he is innocent.

Regardless of what he is, he is still not 'right in the head' for sleeping with children. He needs Psychiatric help and since his state of mind makes it more profitable for the people around him, he is not given the help he needs.

A shame really. He is quite a talented man, too bad his issues got in the way of success.

2006-08-27 03:03:52 · answer #4 · answered by sherasi 5 · 1 0

What if the world really is flat? What if OJ really didn't do it? What if there really could be world peace? If it looks like a child molester, walks like a child molester, talks like a child molester and acts like a child molester....it's safe to say it is a child molester.

2006-08-27 03:01:28 · answer #5 · answered by Kim H 2 · 1 1

well he was found innocent twice because there was no evidence

2006-08-27 02:59:35 · answer #6 · answered by wLb129 5 · 0 0

The whole world would be wrong.

2006-08-27 02:59:00 · answer #7 · answered by x_ducati 2 · 0 0

Yeah...you mean 'innocent' like O.J.??

2006-08-27 03:00:41 · answer #8 · answered by just me 5 · 0 1

A hundred little boys can't be wrong.

2006-08-27 02:58:59 · answer #9 · answered by curiousgeorge 3 · 0 1

http://magegame.ru/?rf=6972756e6b615f37

2006-08-27 02:58:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers