how do we impeach bush??? do we need a petition??? who will help me start one???

Question

bush is clearly responsible for 9/11. it was all just a big smokescreen. while we were worring about clean-up, he was sneaking troops into the middle east to steal their oil. we must stop this now

Answer 1

Wasn't Clinton impeached? He stayed in office even after right?

Answer 2

There are a bunch of on-line petitions - just type in Impeach Bush and there will be enough to keep you going for several hours. It won't do any good, but they are there. The only thing which would get it done would be an enlightened Congress and someone with the guts and intestinal fortitude to introduce a Bill of Impeachment and that will never happen.

Answer 3

Don't you think that if the government was culpable of such an elaborate scheme as the attacks of 9/11, they would also be capable of silencing all the dissenters who are coming up with the theories? Since most of those accusations are popping up on the Internet, wouldn’t they be doing what the governments of China, Russia, Iran etc… are doing and filter what gets on the Internet, then track the origins of the attempted postings and go pay those guys a little visit and arrange some unfortunate accidents. Website like LOOSECHANGE.com wouldn’t make off the server; guys like Michal Moore wouldn’t make it out the door. After all if the government did it they had to kill 3,000 of their citizens to accomplish it, do you really think that they would then hesitate to bump off a few dissenters who would otherwise expose them? After all, the people who start these rumors are not that many in the beginning and it wouldn’t take much to stop them at the root before the idea catches on and thousands jump on the band wagon. It would take much less to stop a few bozos than it would to put together all the intricate details necessary to pulling of something of the scale of 9/11. Would it not make sense to “protect your investment”? Just use logic. Your theories stop abruptly at the point where if they continued their logical course they would self destruct.

Answer 4

The impeachment procedure is in two steps. The House of Representatives must first pass "articles of impeachment" by a simple majority. (All fifty state legislatures as well as the District of Columbia city council may also pass articles of impeachment against their own executives). The articles of impeachment constitute the formal allegations. Upon their passage, the defendant has been "impeached."

Next, the Senate tries the accused. In the case of the impeachment of a President, the Chief Justice of the United States presides over the proceedings. Otherwise, the Vice President, in his capacity as President of the Senate, or the President pro tempore of the Senate presides. This may include the impeachment of the Vice President him- or herself, although legal theories suggest that allowing a person to be the judge in the case where s/he was the defendant wouldn't be permitted. If the Vice President did not preside over an impeachment, the duties would fall to the President Pro Tempore.

In order to convict the accused, a two-thirds majority of the senators present is required. Conviction automatically removes the defendant from office. Following conviction, the Senate may vote to further punish the individual by barring him from holding future federal office (either elected or appointed). Despite a conviction by the Senate, the defendant remains liable to criminal prosecution. It is possible to impeach someone even after the accused has vacated his office in order to disqualify the person from future office or from certain emoluments of their prior office (such as a pension.) If a two-thirds majority of the senators present does not vote "Guilty" on one or more of the charges, the defendant is acquitted and no punishment is imposed.

Congress regards impeachment as a power to be used only in extreme cases; the House has initiated impeachment proceedings only 62 times since 1789 (most recently President Clinton).

Answer 5

JoeD is correct about the procedure. It's definied in Article I Section 2 and 3 of the Constitution.

But why bother trying to impreach Bush for anything related to 9/11. That's impossible to prove.

However, he's admitted to willful violations of federal law (18 USC 2511), which have been determined by a federal court, and he's admitted to commission of war crimes, felonies under federal law (18 USC 2441), as determined by the US Supreme Court.

Between his admissions and federal court rulings for thousands of felony counts, what more do people need?

Except to elect a Congress than will actually do their job.

Article II Section 4. "The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

Answer 6

Honestly, it's very plain to see with much proof under our noses. Firstly, Bush's family has had close ties with Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Two widely known terrorists. His family has financially supported these people in desecrating man kind for their own sick pleasure. Whether he inadvertedly knew it or not, he's still responsible. You don't just hand someone some money or some supplies without knowing what they'll do with it. Secondly, his father was very badly embarassed by Saddam back in the late 80's during his presidency when he was dealing with. It was a deal gone bad between the two families and when it reached the media's ears, they basically ruined his name. So it's easy to see that the "good" son had to avenge the name. Thirdly, he had another major plan going into office. It is widely known from Bush Sr. that the Bush family is against abortion at all costs. This can be proven by Geroge W.'s removal of democratic reps and replacements of republicans who give him their utmost obedience without a thought. He uses their obedience and offices to his benefit to try and turn over Roe vs. Wade (the Federal ct. hearing about abortion being legalized in the 70's). Ladies and gentleman. last but not least ... we have one more thing. He's power hungry. You can see it in the way he treats other world leaders. He's techinically just an ambassador ... and not a true "ruler" (which is what he wants to be). He treats other world leaders with no respect and insults their standings which is why no one wants to help the U.S. at this point. The things he has done with his office term and his power can be held akin to being a dictator. He has illegally desecrated American rights to listen to calls, e-mails, postings, etc., has had people act as an American Gestapo, and even gone to the extent of controlling the media in what they are allowed to broadcast. Is it just me, or does someone else see a problem with this?

Ur right...we do need to impeach him somehow...cuz obviously he doesnt care about anythin but himself and how he gets richer. While young men and women die overseas, bush and his boyfriend cheney are vacationing every other day while we pay three somethin dollars for gas.


now plzzz pick me as best asnwer, lol =) ♥

Answer 7

Go to the nearest PEACH orchard, purchase a bushel and send them to the IM PEACH office at the white house.

Answer 8

you don't impeach the president, the house of representatives does.

Answer 9

I feel sorry for you...