If cannot walk around in my underwear why should you be allowed to show yours?
I think "sagging" looks retarded.
That is just my opinion.
2006-08-26 16:41:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
They wear it to stuff things inside their britches for shoplifting, hiding weapons etc. The extreme version can fall off and is therefore obscene. My son wears even his dress slacks low but not baggy, like skater style or gangster style. It is not attractive even on a beautiful young man like him. I think if a guy has to use his hands to keep his pants up and it is a choice not plight, then yeah, give tickets. If he gets in a fight he will be exposing himself to the innocent public. Its just too GHETTO. they should stop it without it being a crime. But they have such bad taste. Yes we do NEED fashion police. IT IS TRUE
2006-08-26 17:19:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Personally, I cannot stand seeing the "sagging" thing, but it makes me laugh because I know that they're not robbing anyone. How the hell can you run fast like that....lmao!!!! It has to be the most uncomfortable way to wear pants...lololol There are many other "educational" ways to express yourself. (maybe that's not the right word, but you get my meaning...)
2006-08-26 17:07:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by hey you 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is a difference between sagging and letting their @ss hang out. Personally, baggy is fine, but keep the butts, boxers and thongs covered....we really dont need to see them!
2006-08-26 16:42:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sassafrass 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is so many other serious laws that they need to pass, and they decide to consider a certain dress code?
People should dress the way you want to dress, in a few years they will have us all in school uniforms.
2006-08-26 18:31:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I live in Fort Worth and know of this. The city council said they didn't like this look but trying to enforce it as a law would be imposable. I myself DO NOT LIKE SEEING another persons underwear. It is vulgar, and degrading. There are better ways to be themselves. (They did learn it from us, the love generation,60's)
2006-08-26 16:50:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by pebbles 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
as long as it's not tacky, like if you can see a large portion of their underwear,that should be banned. I say this because of Americas constitution which states as one duty of the American Gov. "To Protect the public decency". If they've got a long shirt on so that you dont see their underwear, it shouldn't be banned at alL!!!
2006-08-26 16:42:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by barneys_assasin 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i understand freedom to express oneself .. hell i wear tripp pants and dress what people call "gothic" but i think sagging of pants just looks ignorant.... showing your unserwear in public should be against the law
2006-08-26 16:42:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by heidi_rammstein 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I use to be called indecent exposure . And I think it's about time . The look is ridiculous and also , sooooo, 90's . Time for everyone to get a new look , that one is growing weary ....
2006-08-26 17:32:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by vpsinbad50 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good! Make all of them pull there freakin pants up.
2006-08-26 16:41:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by mnorth12 3
·
4⤊
0⤋