Choices are:
1 - George W Bush, Junior / America
2 - Dick Cheney, America
3 - Kim JDaw ill / xxx
4 - IranKim Dae-jung's / N Korea
5 - Mahmoud Ahmadinejad / Iran
6 - Hu Jintao / China
7 - Hillary Rodham Clinton / NY
8 - Michael Jackson / Not Avail
9 - Ehud Olmert / Israel
10 - The Pope Of Rome, Joseph Ratzinger
2006-08-26 15:08:36 · 19 answers · asked by skystriker65 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think the1,2,7,and 9 =S
2006-08-26 15:17:43 · answer #1 · answered by one 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. GW no. He is supporting destroying enemies to capitalism and freedom.
2. VP Cheney unless he becomes President, he has no real power.
3. Kim Jong Il-only if we let him get nukes. Likelihood 0%
4????
5. Iran will wipe out US and Israel if we let them. If Americans elect another liberal to President, which is not likely.
6. China will not destroy the world, only do business with those who do. In a sense, they would indirectly fund it.
7. Sen Clinton will never be President, so she is meaningless
8. Michael Jackson is not important enough to have any impact on anything
9. Olmert will not last long. He is a terrorist appeaser and the Israelis will revolt on him.
10. The Pope can do nothing to destroy the world
I cannot see how any of these choices can impact the world in a meaningful way, certainly destroy it.
2006-08-26 22:17:05 · answer #2 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it will be a group effort. The Bush/Cheney Administration set the ball rolling when they went into Iraq and now were forced to negotiate with Iran, North Korea and China. We've lost our power base and respectability internationally. The irony is Iraq was by far militarily inferior to the United States and yet we're ensnared like a monkey in a trap. I think unless something radical happens we'll be forced to go into Iran and then the nuclear weapons will start. First however we'll have every disgruntled ex military, convict, nut job committing acts of terrorism on American soil in the name of Al Quedia and Hezb"allah. Similar to the Ramsey note claiming she'd been kidnapped by a foreign faction.
2006-08-26 22:18:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your selection is pretty impressive.. the destruction of the world will not be caused by any one idividual but by a Holy Jihad; as described in the Quran as well as the Bible. Israel will be at the center as will Iran. Syria is in the middle and will receive the most damage (at the onset). But it will enlarge to include other nations..To name a few.... Russia, China.. not excluding the terrorists. A potential of 1 billion of them.. only a small percentage are active now but when push comes to shove... all stops are to be let out.
The only hope of avoiding it is to see Bush's plan work. The likelyhood of that continues to be erroded by miscontents in our own country. Indicating that the show must or will go on. With the miscontents giving encouragement to the Jihadists.
To refine the answer to correspond to your question.. the names would have to be Israels replacement for the present head of state (looks like he is going to be forced out) and Iran's president.
2006-08-26 22:34:59 · answer #4 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
While it takes more than one man to destroy the world-
Bush is certainly doing a fine job at bringing down America and fostering a tremendous amount of instability in the world.
so, I'll vote #1
2006-08-26 22:15:12 · answer #5 · answered by Morey000 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
None of the above - they are nothing more than puppets. It is pretty much common knowledge that a group of elite families rule the world - called the Illuminati. Many sites on this subject.
2006-08-26 23:48:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, I don't think any of them really...N. Korea would probably like to, but lack the capability at this point in time. So, I'll go with Hillary, just because I can't stand her.
2006-08-26 22:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A democrat...not sure which one, but it'll definately be a democrat. Leave it to the left-wing liberal nut-jobs. And then after they're done, as the earth sits in ruin...with his/her last breath the liberal will blame a conservative!
2006-08-26 22:21:04 · answer #8 · answered by theres_gotta_be_more_2_life 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definetly NOT MIchael Jackson!! He does everything he can to make the world a better place!!
â¥â¥We Love You Michael!!!!â¥â¥
2006-08-26 22:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
None of your list will destroy the world. So I've picked mine.
Gort. It is what we have in store for us if we don't play nice and share our toys like Mommy taught us.
2006-08-26 22:37:38 · answer #10 · answered by SPLATT 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋